Excessive precision compromises accuracy even with unlimited resources due to the trade-off in quantum metrology
arXiv:2501.17427 · doi:10.1038/s41534-025-01071-4
Abstract
Precision and accuracy, as two crucial criteria for quantum metrology, have previously lacked rigorous definitions and distinctions. In this paper, we provide a unified definition of precision and accuracy from the perspective of distinguishing neighboring quantum states. Using the quantum Cramér-Rao bound as a lower bound for precision, we find that the corresponding accuracy will fall short of expectations, because the bias of the parameter estimation cannot be ignored. Given that probability estimation is unbiased, defining precision from the perspective of probability distributions provides a more comprehensive approach. This leads to a correction of the traditional precision lower bound by a factor of 2. The trade-off between precision and accuracy shows that precision can be further improved by sacrificing accuracy, while it should be restricted by inherent precision limit. The inherent precision limit, determined by the number of sampling, can reach the Heisenberg scaling even without entanglement resources, which, however, comes at the cost of significantly reduced accuracy. We show that accuracy may actually decrease with increasing sampling when one pursues excessive precision, which indicates the trade-off should be considered even with unlimited resources.
21 pages, 3 figures
References in corpus (31)
- Quantum sensing
- Advances in Quantum Metrology
- Quantum metrology
- Quantum Fisher information matrix and multiparameter estimation
- Quantum speed limit for physical processes
- Quantum limits to dynamical evolution
- Optimal states and almost optimal adaptive measurements for quantum interferometry
- Scalable Spin Squeezing for Quantum-Enhanced Magnetometry with Bose-Einstein Condensates
- Generalized Geometric Quantum Speed Limits
- Interaction-based quantum metrology showing scaling beyond the Heisenberg limit
- General optimality of the Heisenberg limit for quantum metrology
- Quantum-Enhanced Sensing Based on Time Reversal of Nonlinear Dynamics
- Quantum metrology with a scanning probe atom interferometer
- Quantum state magnification
- Geometric derivation of the quantum speed limit
- Detection loss tolerant supersensitive phase measurement with an SU(1,1) interferometer
- Exponentially Enhanced Quantum Metrology
- True precision limits in quantum metrology
- Ziv-Zakai Error Bounds for Quantum Parameter Estimation
- Kind of entanglement that speeds up quantum evolution
- Sub-Heisenberg estimation strategies are ineffective
- The role of entanglement in dynamical evolution
- -Corrected Heisenberg Limit
- Bayesian multi-parameter quantum metrology with limited data
- Quantum metrology in the presence of limited data
- Statistical speed of quantum states: Generalized quantum Fisher information and Schatten speed
- Nonlinear interferometry beyond classical limit facilitated by cyclic dynamics
- Nonlinear metrology with a quantum interface
- Super-Heisenberg scaling in Hamiltonian parameter estimation in the long-range Kitaev chain
- Fundamental accuracy-resolution trade-off for timekeeping devices
- Supersensitivity of Kerr phase estimation with two-mode squeezed vacuum states