Galaxy infall models for arbitrary velocity directions
arXiv:2501.13149 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553892
Abstract
For most galaxies in the cosmos, our knowledge of their motion is limited to line-of-sight velocities from redshift observations. To determine the radial velocity between two galaxies the minor and major infall models were established by Karachentsev & Kashibadze (2006). Regardless of the background cosmology, our derivations reveal that these infall models approximate the total radial velocity between two galaxies by two different projections employing different information about the system. For galaxies having small angular separations , all infall models agree that the radial velocity is the difference of their line-of-sight components. Applying these models to ca. halos of the Illustris-3 simulation, we find the perpendicular and tangential velocity parts to be non-negligible for more than 90% of all, more than 5000 infalling subhalos. Thus, even for deg, the infall-model velocities deviate from the true radial velocity. Only for 30% we found the true one lay between the minor and major infall velocity. However, the infall models yield robust upper and lower bounds to the true radial velocity dispersion. Observed under deg the velocity dispersion inferred from the sole difference of line-of-sight velocity components even coincides with the true one, justifying this approach for high-redshift groups and clusters. Based on these findings, we predict the radial velocity dispersion of the M81-group from the minor infall model (upper bound) $σ_{\mathrm{r,min}} = (180 \pm 42)~\mbox{km}/\mbox{s}$, from the major infall model (lower bound) $σ_{\mathrm{r,maj}} = (142 \pm 64) ~\mbox{km}/\mbox{s}$ and $σ_\mathrm{r,Δv} = (99 \pm 36)~\mbox{km}/\mbox{s}$ from the line-of-sight-velocity difference.
15 pages, 11 figures; in press at Astronomy & Astrophysics
References in corpus (22)
- Properties of galaxies reproduced by a hydrodynamic simulation
- Updated Nearby Galaxy Catalog
- The Illustris Simulation: Public Data Release
- The Early Data Release of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument
- The M31 Velocity Vector. II. Radial Orbit Towards the Milky Way and Implied Local Group Mass
- Is the Observable Universe Consistent with the Cosmological Principle?
- Confirmation of Faint Dwarf Galaxies in the M81 Group
- How isotropic is the Universe?
- Cosmicflows-4
- The Hubble flow around the Local Group
- The M31 Velocity Vector. I. Hubble Space Telescope Proper Motion Measurements
- A dynamical model of the local cosmic expansion
- Angular momentum properties of haloes and their baryon content in the Illustris simulation
- First Gaia Dynamics of the Andromeda System: DR2 Proper Motions, Orbits, and Rotation of M31 and M33
- Balancing mass and momentum in the Local Group
- Mass Determination of Groups of Galaxies: Effects of the Cosmological Constant
- The Local Group Mass in the light of Gaia
- How did the Virgo cluster form?
- Determination of the Local Hubble Constant from Virgo Infall Using TRGB Distances
- Identification of Basins of Attraction in the Local Universe
- Covariant cosmography: the observer-dependence of the Hubble parameter
- Line-of-Sight Velocity Projection Impact on the Local Group Mass