Is there a conflict between causality and diamagnetism?
arXiv:2501.13098 · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ae1630
Abstract
There is a long-standing apparent conflict between the existence of diamagnetism and causality as expressed through the Kramers-Kronig relations. In essence, using causality arguments, along with a small number of seemingly well-justified assumptions, one can show that diamagnetism is impossible. However, experiments show diamagnetic responses from magnetic media. We present a resolution to this issue, which also explains the absence of observed dia-electric responses in media. In the process, we expose some of the short-comings in earlier analyses that have kept the paradox alive.
12 pages + appendices, 2 figures. Published version
References in corpus (12)
- Resolution of Gauge Ambiguities in Ultrastrong-Coupling Cavity QED
- A DC magnetic metamaterial
- Perspective: Quantum Hamiltonians for Optical Interactions
- Gauge ambiguities imply Jaynes-Cummings physics remains valid in ultrastrong coupling QED
- Unified approach to QED in arbitrary linear media
- Strong diamagnetic response of metamaterials
- Nonlocal effects in temporal metamaterials
- Avoiding gauge ambiguities in cavity QED
- Diamagnetism and the dispersion of the magnetic permeability
- Four definitions of magnetic permeability for periodic metamaterials
- Longitudinal Angular Momentum in Magneto-Mie Scattering: Quantum Vacuum Correction to the Einstein-De Haas effect
- Stirring the quantum vacuum: Angular Casimir Momentum of a Landau Charge