Moderate Physical Perspectivalism
arXiv:2410.13819 · doi:10.1017/psa.2024.73
Abstract
Recent developments in foundations of physics have given rise to a class of views suggesting that physically meaningful descriptions must always be relativized to a physical perspective. In this article I distinguish between strong physical perspectivalism, which maintains that all facts must be relativized to a perspective, and moderate physical perspectivalism, which maintains that all empirically meaningful descriptions must be relativized to a perspective. I argue that both scientific evidence and philosophical considerations support moderate physical perspectivalism over strong physical perspectivalism. In particular, motivations connected to epistemic humility and the social nature of science are more compatible with the moderate approach.
References in corpus (14)
- Partial observables
- Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames
- A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner's friend paradox
- A change of perspective: switching quantum reference frames via a perspective-neutral framework
- Quantum clocks and the temporal localisability of events in the presence of gravitating quantum systems
- Quantum superposition of spacetimes obeys Einstein's Equivalence Principle
- Relational Quantum Mechanics is about Facts, not States: A reply to Pienaar and Brukner
- How to switch between relational quantum clocks
- The view from a Wigner bubble
- Qubits are not observers -- a no-go theorem
- Perspectival Quantum Realism
- Relational Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Relativism, and the Iteration of Relativity
- Quantum Reconstructions as Stepping Stones toward Psi-Doxastic Interpretations?
- Princeton seminars on physics and philosophy