PolicyCraft: Supporting Collaborative and Participatory Policy Design through Case-Grounded Deliberation
arXiv:2409.15644 · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713865
Abstract
Community and organizational policies are typically designed in a top-down, centralized fashion, with limited input from impacted stakeholders. This can result in policies that are misaligned with community needs or perceived as illegitimate. How can we support more collaborative, participatory approaches to policy design? In this paper, we present PolicyCraft, a system that structures collaborative policy design through case-grounded deliberation. Building on past research that highlights the value of concrete cases in establishing common ground, PolicyCraft supports users in collaboratively proposing, critiquing, and revising policies through discussion and voting on cases. A field study across two university courses showed that students using PolicyCraft reached greater consensus and developed better-supported course policies, compared with those using a baseline system that did not scaffold their use of concrete cases. Reflecting on our findings, we discuss opportunities for future HCI systems to help groups more effectively bridge between abstract policies and concrete cases.
References in corpus (8)
- Surviving an "Eternal September" - How an Online Community Managed a Surge of Newcomers
- (A)I Am Not a Lawyer, But...: Engaging Legal Experts towards Responsible LLM Policies for Legal Advice
- Understanding Frontline Workers' and Unhoused Individuals' Perspectives on AI Used in Homeless Services
- Keeping Community in the Loop: Understanding Wikipedia Stakeholder Values for Machine Learning-Based Systems
- PolicyKit: Building Governance in Online Communities
- The Future of HCI-Policy Collaboration
- Wikibench: Community-Driven Data Curation for AI Evaluation on Wikipedia
- Judgment Sieve: Reducing Uncertainty in Group Judgments through Interventions Targeting Ambiguity versus Disagreement