Hydrostatic mass of galaxy clusters within some theories of gravity
arXiv:2408.14280 · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116790
Abstract
The mass of galaxy clusters (GCs) can be determined by calculating the hydrostatic equilibrium equation. In this work, we derive the hydrostatic mass of GCs within Eddington-inspired Born-Infeld (EiBI) theory, beyond Horndeski gravity (BHG), and modified emergent Newtonian gravity (MENG) with generalized uncertainty principle (GUP) correction. We apply the formulations on the masses of 10 GCs. We compare our results with the Newtonian mass of GCs. Within a regime, we get an insight that all formulations could match the Newtonian mass. Thus, the impact of the modified theories of gravity used in this work can be neglected in this regime. The noteworthy impact starts if we set m for EiBI theory, for BHG, and for MENG. We also compare our results from EiBI theory and BHG with the baryonic masses of the GCs. A better linear fit is achieved by EiBI theory with m, which gives the slope of . This value is closer to unity than the one of BHG. This leads us to the fact that EiBI theory is more effective than BHG in alleviating the mass discrepancy between hydrostatic mass and baryonic mass in GCs. Nevertheless, neither EiBI theory nor BHG completely addresses the mass discrepancy problem.
arXiv comment21 pages, 2 figures, 1 table
References in corpus (35)
- Modified Gravity and Cosmology
- On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton
- Chandra sample of nearby relaxed galaxy clusters: mass, gas fraction, and mass-temperature relation
- Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters
- Formation of Galaxy Clusters
- Tracing cosmic evolution with clusters of galaxies
- Eddington's theory of gravity and its progeny
- Cosmological Tests of Gravity
- The relation between velocity dispersion and mass in simulated clusters of galaxies: dependence on the tracer and the baryonic physics
- Gravitational tests of the Generalized Uncertainty Principle
- Masses of galaxy clusters from gravitational lensing
- Mass profiles of Galaxy Clusters from X-ray analysis
- Astrophysical Probes of the Vainshtein Mechanism: Stars and Galaxies
- Testing chameleon gravity with the Coma cluster
- Modified gravity inside astrophysical bodies
- Testing Gravity Using Dwarf Stars
- Emergent Gravity Paradigm: Recent Progress
- First test of Verlinde's theory of Emergent Gravity using Weak Gravitational Lensing measurements
- Testing Gravity Using Galaxy Clusters: New Constraints on Beyond Horndeski Theories
- Gravity is not an entropic force
- Observational Tests of Nonlocal Gravity: Galaxy Rotation Curves and Clusters of Galaxies
- Conservative entropic forces
- Testing Verlinde's Emergent Gravity with the Radial Acceleration Relation
- Inconsistencies in Verlinde's emergent gravity
- Measuring galaxy cluster mass profiles into the low acceleration regime with galaxy kinematics
- Testing Verlinde's emergent gravity in early-type galaxies
- Testing Emergent Gravity on Galaxy Cluster Scales
- The Effects of Minimal Length, Maximal Momentum and Minimal Momentum in Entropic Force
- Gravitational Lensing and the Mass Distribution of Clusters
- Dark Energy and the mass of galaxy clusters
- The virial theorem in Eddington-Born-Infeld gravity
- Where are the missing baryons in clusters?
- Galaxy cluster hydrostatic masses using Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equation
- Generalized entropic gravity from modified Unruh temperature
- Cosmological constraints on galaxy cluster structure