The Effects of Generative AI on Design Fixation and Divergent Thinking

Abstract

Generative AI systems have been heralded as tools for augmenting human creativity and inspiring divergent thinking, though with little empirical evidence for these claims. This paper explores the effects of exposure to AI-generated images on measures of design fixation and divergent thinking in a visual ideation task. Through a between-participants experiment (N=60), we found that support from an AI image generator during ideation leads to higher fixation on an initial example. Participants who used AI produced fewer ideas, with less variety and lower originality compared to a baseline. Our qualitative analysis suggests that the effectiveness of co-ideation with AI rests on participants' chosen approach to prompt creation and on the strategies used by participants to generate ideas in response to the AI's suggestions. We discuss opportunities for designing generative AI systems for ideation support and incorporating these AI tools into ideation workflows.

Accepted at the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 24),18 pages, 15 figures,

Cited by in corpus (4)

• Inkspire: Supporting Design Exploration with Generative AI through Analogical Sketching
• Beyond Automation: How UI/UX Designers Perceive AI as a Creative Partner in the Divergent Thinking Stages
• From Fake Perfects to Conversational Imperfects: Exploring Image-Generative AI as a Boundary Object for Participatory Design of Public Spaces
• VideoDiff: Human-AI Video Co-Creation with Alternatives