Measurement incompatibility at all remote parties do not always permit Bell nonlocality
arXiv:2312.15705 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.111.052208
Abstract
Two important ingredients necessary for obtaining Bell nonlocal correlations between two spatially separated parties are an entangled state shared between them and an incompatible set of measurements employed by each of them. We focus on the relation of Bell nonlocality with incompatibility of the set of measurements employed by both the parties, in the two-input and two-output scenario. We first observe that Bell nonlocality can always be established when both parties employ any set of incompatible projective measurements. On the other hand, going beyond projective measurements, we present a class of incompatible positive operator-valued measures, employed by both the observers, which can never activate Bell nonlocality. Furthermore, we find a sufficient criterion for achieving Bell nonlocal correlations given a fixed amount of pure two-qubit entanglement and a fixed amount of incompatibility of projective measurements applied by either both parties or a single party.
7 pages
References in corpus (32)
- Quantum entanglement
- Bell nonlocality
- Entanglement detection
- Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks
- Violation of Bell's inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions
- Random Numbers Certified by Bell's Theorem
- Conditions for a class of entanglement transformations
- Bell inequalities for arbitrarily high dimensional systems
- Entanglement monotones
- Device-independent quantum key distribution secure against collective attacks
- Bell's inequalities and density matrices. Revealing hidden nonlocality.
- Entanglement of pure states for a single copy
- Private Randomness Expansion With Untrusted Devices
- Nonsequential positive-operator-valued measurements on entangled mixed states do not always violate a Bell inequality
- Challenging local realism with human choices
- Device independent quantum random number generation
- An Invitation to Quantum Incompatibility
- Minimal conditions for local pure-state entanglement manipulation
- Measurements incompatible in Quantum Theory cannot be measured jointly in any other local theory
- Collective tests for quantum nonlocality
- Incompatible measurements in quantum information science
- Bell inequalities for continuous-variable correlations
- Notes on Joint Measurability of Quantum Observables
- Non-disturbing quantum measurements
- Quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality
- Measurement incompatibility does not give rise to Bell violation in general
- A Method of Areas for Manipulating the Entanglement Properties of One Copy of a Two-Particle Pure State
- Device-independent quantum key distribution with asymmetric CHSH inequalities
- Commutative POVMs and Fuzzy Observables
- Bell nonlocality is not sufficient for the security of standard device-independent quantum key distribution protocols
- Device-independent quantum key distribution with arbitrarily small nonlocality
- Multi-Component Bell Inequality and its Violation for Continuous Variable Systems