Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Mis-centering calibration and X-ray-richness scaling relations in redMaPPer clusters
arXiv:2310.13207
Abstract
We use Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) clusters with archival X-ray data from XMM-Newton and Chandra to assess the centering performance of the redMaPPer cluster finder and to measure key richness observable scaling relations. In terms of centering, we find that 10-20% of redMaPPer clusters are miscentered with no significant difference in bins of low versus high richness ( and ) or redshift ( and ). We also investigate the richness bias induced by miscentering. The dominant reasons for miscentering include masked or missing data and the presence of other bright galaxies in the cluster; for half of the miscentered clusters the correct central was one of the other possible centrals identified by redMaPPer, while for % of miscentered clusters the correct central is not a redMaPPer member with most of these cases due to masking. In addition, we fit the scaling relations between X-ray temperature and richness and between X-ray luminosity and richness. We find a T- scatter of . While the scatter in T- is consistent in bins of redshift, we do find modestly different slopes with high-redshift clusters displaying a somewhat shallower relation. Splitting based on richness, we find a marginally larger scatter for our lowest richness bin, . The X-ray properties of detected, serendipitous clusters are generally consistent with those for targeted clusters, but the depth of the X-ray data for undetected clusters is insufficient to judge whether they are X-ray underluminous in all but one case.
References in corpus (30)
- Collisional Plasma Models with APEC/APED: Emission Line Diagnostics of Hydrogen-like and Helium-like Ions
- HI4PI: A full-sky HI survey based on EBHIS and GASS
- Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration
- Some Aspects of Measurement Error in Linear Regression of Astronomical Data
- Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters
- Formation of Galaxy Clusters
- redMaPPer I: Algorithm and SDSS DR8 Catalog
- A Wavelet-Based Algorithm for the Spatial Analysis of Poisson Data
- eROSITA Science Book: Mapping the Structure of the Energetic Universe
- The structural and scaling properties of nearby galaxy clusters - II. The M-T relation
- The redMaPPer Galaxy Cluster Catalog From DES Science Verification Data
- Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cluster Abundances and Weak Lensing
- Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Weak Lensing Mass Calibration of redMaPPer Galaxy Clusters
- Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Photometric Data Set for Cosmology
- XMM-Newton and Chandra Cross Calibration Using HIFLUGCS Galaxy Clusters: Systematic Temperature Differences and Cosmological Impact
- Weighing the Giants V: Galaxy Cluster Scaling Relations
- Constraints on the Richness-Mass Relation and the Optical-SZE Positional Offset Distribution for SZE-Selected Clusters
- Cosmological Constraints from DES Y1 Cluster Abundances and SPT Multi-wavelength data
- Modeling projection effects in optically-selected cluster catalogues
- Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Calibration of Cluster Mis-centering in the redMaPPer Catalogs
- Galaxy Cluster Mass Estimation from Stacked Spectroscopic Analysis
- The XMM Cluster Survey: X-ray analysis methodology
- LoCuSS: Scaling relations between galaxy cluster mass, gas, and stellar content
- Spectroscopic Quantification of Projection Effects in the SDSS redMaPPer Galaxy Cluster Catalogue
- Exploring the contamination of the DES-Y1 Cluster Sample with SPT-SZ selected clusters
- Mass Variance from Archival X-ray Properties of Dark Energy Survey Year-1 Galaxy Clusters
- Chandra Follow-Up of the SDSS DR8 redMaPPer Catalog Using the MATCha Pipeline
- Velocity Dispersions of Clusters in the Dark Energy Survey Y3 redMaPPer Catalog
- The XMM Cluster Survey: Exploring scaling relations and completeness of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 redMaPPer cluster catalogue
- Improved Cosmological Constraints from SDSS redMaPPer Clusters via X-ray Follow-up of a Complete Subsample of Systems