A convenient approach to characterizing model uncertainty with application to early dark energy solutions of the Hubble tension

Abstract

Despite increasingly precise observations and sophisticated theoretical models, the discrepancy between measurements of H0 from the cosmic microwave background or from Baryon Acoustic Oscillations combined with Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis versus those from local distance ladder probes -- commonly known as the $H_0$ tension -- continues to perplex the scientific community. To address this tension, Early Dark Energy (EDE) models have been proposed as alternatives to $\Lambda$CDM, as they can change the observed sound horizon and the inferred Hubble constant from measurements based on this. In this paper, we investigate the use of Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) to evaluate EDE as a solution to the H0 tension. BMA consists of assigning a prior to the model and deriving a posterior as for any other unknown parameter in a Bayesian analysis. BMA can be computationally challenging in that one must approximate the joint posterior of both model and parameters. Here we present a computational strategy for BMA that exploits existing MCMC software and combines model-specific posteriors post-hoc. In application to a comprehensive analysis of cosmological datasets, we quantify the impact of EDE on the H0 discrepancy. We find an EDE model probability of $\sim$90% whenever we include the H0 measurement from Type Ia Supernovae in the analysis, whereas the other data show a strong preference for the standard cosmological model. We finally present constraints on common parameters marginalized over both cosmological models. For reasonable priors on models with and without EDE, the H0 tension is reduced by at least 20%.

References in corpus (24)

• Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models
• Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: a Monte-Carlo approach
• The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample
• The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed Type Ia Supernovae from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from The Combined Pantheon Sample
• Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics Beyond LambdaCDM
• The Clustering of the SDSS DR7 Main Galaxy Sample I: A 4 per cent Distance Measure at z=0.15
• The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological Implications from two Decades of Spectroscopic Surveys at the Apache Point observatory
• Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology
• Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods
• Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension
• Solar fusion cross sections II: the pp chain and CNO cycles
• Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing
• Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models
• Efficient sampling of fast and slow cosmological parameters
• One percent determination of the primordial deuterium abundance
• CMB power spectrum parameter degeneracies in the era of precision cosmology
• The 6dF Galaxy Survey: z \approx 0 measurement of the growth rate and sigma_8
• Early dark energy, the Hubble-parameter tension, and the string axiverse
• Oscillating scalar fields and the Hubble tension: a resolution with novel signatures
• Early Dark Energy Does Not Restore Cosmological Concordance
• Cosmological implications of ultra-light axion-like fields
• Ultra-Light Scalar Fields and the Growth of Structure in the Universe
• Eryn : A multi-purpose sampler for Bayesian inference
• Bayesian Model Averaging in Astrophysics: A Review

Cited by in corpus (2)

• Stage IV baryonic feedback correction for non-Gaussianity inference
• Graph-based Summary Statistics for Revealing the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background in Pulsar Timing Arrays