Enhanced repetition codes for the cross-platform comparison of progress towards fault-tolerance
arXiv:2308.08909 · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ad5085
Abstract
Achieving fault-tolerance will require a strong relationship between the hardware and the protocols used. Different approaches will therefore naturally have tailored proof-of-principle experiments to benchmark progress. Nevertheless, repetition codes have become a commonly used basis of experiments that allow cross-platform comparisons. Here we propose methods by which repetition code experiments can be expanded and improved, while retaining cross-platform compatibility. We also consider novel methods of analyzing the results, which offer more detailed insights than simple calculation of the logical error rate.
References in corpus (17)
- Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit
- Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays
- Quantum error correction in a solid-state hybrid spin register
- Detecting arbitrary quantum errors via stabilizer measurements on a sublattice of the surface code
- A Race Track Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor
- Realization of an Error-Correcting Surface Code with Superconducting Qubits
- Analytic and numerical demonstration of quantum self-correction in the 3D Cubic Code
- Quantum error correction with silicon spin qubits
- Encoding a magic state with beyond break-even fidelity
- Matching and maximum likelihood decoding of a multi-round subsystem quantum error correction experiment
- Calibrated decoders for experimental quantum error correction
- Demonstration of sufficient control for two rounds of quantum error correction in a solid state ensemble quantum information processor
- Improved HDRG decoders for qudit and non-Abelian quantum error correction
- Demonstrating non-Abelian braiding of surface code defects in a five qubit experiment
- Benchmarking near-term devices with quantum error correction
- Adaptive weight estimator for quantum error correction
- Defining Standard Strategies for Quantum Benchmarks