Interpretation of near-threshold peaks using the method of independent S-matrix poles
arXiv:2308.03325 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.045204
Abstract
We propose a model-independent analysis of near-threshold enhancements using independent S-matrix poles. In this formulation, we constructed a Jost function with controllable zeros to ensure that no poles are generated on the physical Riemann sheet. We show that there is a possibility of misinterpreting the observed near-threshold signals if one utilized a limited parametrization and restrict the analysis to only one element of the S-matrix. Specifically, there is a possibility of the emergence of ambiguous pair of poles which are singularities of the full S-matrix but may not manifest in one of its elements. For a more concrete discussion, we focused on an effective two-channel scattering where the full S-matrix is a matrix. We apply our method to the coupled two-channel analysis of the and found that the compact pentaquark interpretation cannot be ruled out yet.
19 pages, 4 figures; Added references
References in corpus (16)
- Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, , and of two-peak structure of the
- Interpretation of the LHCb States as Hadronic Molecules and Hints of a Narrow
- Interpretation of the Narrow Peaks in Decay in the Compact Diquark Model
- Towards a theory of hadron resonances
- Two-pole structures in QCD: Facts, not fantasy!
- Remarks on pole trajectories for resonances
- Measurement of the J/ photoproduction cross section over the full near-threshold kinematic region
- Novel approaches in Hadron Spectroscopy
- Hadron mass scaling near the s-wave threshold
- Revealing the nature of hidden charm pentaquarks with machine learning
- Model independent analysis of coupled-channel scattering: a deep learning approach
- Deep Learning Exotic Hadrons
- Classifying near-threshold enhancement using deep neural network
- Near-threshold Spectrum from Uniformized Mittag-Leffler Expansion -Pole Structure of -
- Application of the Uniformized Mittag-Leffler Expansion to
- Is two-poles' one state or two?