Disorder effects on the so-called Andreev band in Majorana nanowires

Abstract

We comment on a recent publication Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 207001 (2023), pointing out that the periodic model for the superconducting gap and/or the spin splitting used by the authors is artificial and does not apply to any real systems. In addition, we show that the resulting Andreev band introduced by this artificial and unrealistic periodicity is suppressed by the potential disorder invariably present in all experimental systems. The results of this model are therefore contrived and do not apply to any experimental system.

arXiv comment2 pages, 1 figure

References in corpus (7)

• Andreev bound states versus Majorana bound states in quantum dot-nanowire-superconductor hybrid structures: Trivial versus topological zero-bias conductance peaks
• Physical mechanisms for zero-bias conductance peaks in Majorana nanowires
• Disorder-induced zero-bias peaks in Majorana nanowires
• Andreev rectifier: a nonlocal conductance signature of topological phase transitions
• Estimating disorder and its adverse effects in semiconductor Majorana nanowires
• Three-terminal nonlocal conductance in Majorana nanowires: Distinguishing topological and trivial in realistic systems with disorder and inhomogeneous potential
• Trivial Andreev band mimicking topological bulk gap reopening in the non-local conductance of long Rashba nanowires

Cited by in corpus (4)

• Vision transformer based Deep Learning of Topological indicators in Majorana Nanowires
• Reply to "Comment on 'Trivial Andreev Band Mimicking Topological Bulk Gap Reopening in the Nonlocal Conductance of Long Rashba Nanowires'"
• Quantifying the non-Abelian property of Andreev bound states in inhomogeneous Majorana nanowires
• Excess photon-assisted noise of Majorana and Andreev bound states