How reciprocity impacts ordering and phase separation in active nematics?

Abstract

Active nematics undergo spontaneous symmetry breaking and show phase separation instability. Within the prevailing notion that macroscopic properties depend only on symmetries and conservation laws, different microscopic models are used out of convenience. Here, we test this notion carefully by analyzing three different microscopic models of apolar active nematics. They share the same symmetry but differ in implementing reciprocal or non-reciprocal interactions, including a Vicsek-like implementation. We show how such subtle differences in microscopic realization determine if the ordering transition is continuous or first order. Despite the difference in the type of phase transition, all three models exhibit fluctuation-dominated phase separation and quasi-long-range order in the nematic phase.

8 pages, 8 figures; version accepted for publication in Soft Matter

References in corpus (7)

• Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles
• Non-equilibrium clustering of self-propelled rods
• Collective motion and nonequilibrium cluster formation in colonies of gliding bacteria
• Minimal model for active nematics: quasi-long-range order and giant fluctuations
• Active nematics are intrinsically phase-separated
• Aspects of the density field in an active nematic
• Order-disorder transition in active nematic: A lattice model study

Cited by in corpus (2)

• AMEP: The Active Matter Evaluation Package for Python
• Activity-induced phase transition and coarsening dynamics in dry apolar active nematics