How Language Model Hallucinations Can Snowball

Abstract

A major risk of using language models in practical applications is their tendency to hallucinate incorrect statements. Hallucinations are often attributed to knowledge gaps in LMs, but we hypothesize that in some cases, when justifying previously generated hallucinations, LMs output false claims that they can separately recognize as incorrect. We construct three question-answering datasets where ChatGPT and GPT-4 often state an incorrect answer and offer an explanation with at least one incorrect claim. Crucially, we find that ChatGPT and GPT-4 can identify 67% and 87% of their own mistakes, respectively. We refer to this phenomenon as hallucination snowballing: an LM over-commits to early mistakes, leading to more mistakes that it otherwise would not make.

Cited by in corpus (6)

• Vector database management systems: Fundamental concepts, use-cases, and current challenges
• Towards Reliable Generative AI-Driven Scaffolding: Reducing Hallucinations and Enhancing Quality in Self-Regulated Learning Support
• Combining Insights From Multiple Large Language Models Improves Diagnostic Accuracy
• Retrieving Evidence from EHRs with LLMs: Possibilities and Challenges
• CPR: Mitigating Large Language Model Hallucinations with Curative Prompt Refinement
• Hallucinations in LLMs: A Lifecycle-Based Survey of Causes, Detection, Mitigation, and Prevention