Hidden shock powering the peak of SN 2020faa

Abstract

The link between the fate of the most massive stars and the resulting supernova (SN) explosion is still a matter of debate, in major part because of the ambiguity among light-curve powering mechanisms. When stars explode as SNe, the light-curve luminosity is typically sustained by a central engine (radioactive decay, magnetar spin-down, or fallback accretion). However, since massive stars eject considerable amounts of material during their evolution, there may be a significant contribution coming from interactions with the previously ejected circumstellar medium (CSM). Reconstructing the progenitor configuration at the time of explosion requires a detailed analysis of the long-term photometric and spectroscopic evolution of the related transient. In this paper, we present the results of our follow-up campaign of SN 2020faa. Given the high luminosity and peculiar slow light curve, it is purported to have a massive progenitor. We present the spectro-photometric dataset and investigate different options to explain the unusual observed properties that support this assumption. We computed the bolometric luminosity of the supernova and the evolution of its temperature, radius, and expansion velocity. We also fit the observed light curve with a multi-component model to infer information on the progenitor and the explosion mechanism. Reasonable parameters are inferred for SN 2020faa with a magnetar of energy Ep=1.5(+0.5,-0.2)x10^50 erg and spin-down time t(spin)=15+/-1 d, a shell mass M(shell)=2.4(+0.5,-0.4) Msun and kinetic energy Ekin(shell)=0.9(+0.5,-0.3)x 10^51 erg, and a core with M(core)=21.5(+1.4,-0.7) Msun and Ekin(core)=3.9(+0.1,-0.4)x10^51 erg. In addition, we need an extra source to power the luminosity of the second peak. We find that hidden interaction with either a CSM disc or delayed, choked jets is a viable mechanism for supplying the required energy to achieve this effect.

14 pages, 14 figures. Accepted to Astronomy & Astrophysics

References in corpus (13)

• Light Curve Modeling of Superluminous Supernova 2006gy: Collision between Supernova Ejecta and Dense Circumstellar Medium
• PTF11iqb: Cool supergiant mass loss that bridges the gap between Type IIn and normal supernovae
• Energetic eruptions leading to a peculiar hydrogen-rich explosion of a massive star
• The Type IIP Supernova 2012aw in M95: hydrodynamical modelling of the photospheric phase from accurate spectrophotometric monitoring
• Explaining iPTF14hls as a common envelope jets supernova
• A semi-analytical light curve model and its application to type IIP supernovae
• The role of jets in exploding supernovae and in shaping their remnants
• Constraints on the contributions to the observed binary black hole population from individual evolutionary pathways in isolated binary evolution
• Mass-loss rates of Very Massive Stars
• The Zwicky Transient Facility phase I sample of hydrogen-rich superluminous supernovae without strong narrow emission lines
• State-of-the-Art Collapsar Jet Simulations Imply Undetectable Subphotospheric Neutrinos
• Early light curves of Type II supernovae interacting with a circumstellar disk
• Rapid decline in the lightcurves of luminous supernovae by jet-driven bipolar explosions

Cited by in corpus (6)

• On the diversity of strongly-interacting Type IIn supernovae
• A magnetar powers the luminous supernova 2023pel, associated with a long gamma-ray burst
• ZTF-observed late-time signals of pre-ZTF transients
• The story of SN 2021aatd -- a peculiar 1987A-like supernova with an early-phase luminosity excess
• Physical properties of long-rising type II supernovae -- Bayesian analytic modeling and spectrophotometric correlations
• Signatures of anti-social mass-loss in the ordinary Type II SN 2024bch -- A non-interacting supernova with early high-ionisation features