Semi-automatic tuning of coupled climate models with multiple intrinsic timescales: lessons learned from the Lorenz96 model

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the potential for History Matching (HM) to tune a climate system with multi-scale dynamics. By considering a toy climate model, namely, the two-scale Lorenz96 model and producing experiments in perfect-model setting, we explore in detail how several built-in choices need to be carefully tested. We also demonstrate the importance of introducing physical expertise in the range of parameters, a priori to running HM. Finally we revisit a classical procedure in climate model tuning, that consists of tuning the slow and fast components separately. By doing so in the Lorenz96 model, we illustrate the non-uniqueness of plausible parameters and highlight the specificity of metrics emerging from the coupling. This paper contributes also to bridging the communities of uncertainty quantification, machine learning and climate modeling, by making connections between the terms used by each community for the same concept and presenting promising collaboration avenues that would benefit climate modeling research.

arXiv commentSubmission to JAMES journal (AGU), added link to code

References in corpus (10)

• Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
• Earth System Modeling 2.0: A Blueprint for Models That Learn From Observations and Targeted High-Resolution Simulations
• Machine Learning for Stochastic Parameterization: Generative Adversarial Networks in the Lorenz '96 Model
• Bridging observation, theory and numerical simulation of the ocean using Machine Learning
• Calibrate, Emulate, Sample
• Calibration and Uncertainty Quantification of Convective Parameters in an Idealized GCM
• Are General Circulation Models obsolete?
• Uncertainty quantification for computer models with spatial output using calibration-optimal bases
• Data-driven super-parameterization using deep learning: Experimentation with multi-scale Lorenz 96 systems and transfer-learning
• Climbing down Charney's ladder: Machine Learning and the post-Dennard era of computational climate science