Interacting with next-phrase suggestions: How suggestion systems aid and influence the cognitive processes of writing
arXiv:2208.00636 · doi:10.1145/3581641.3584060
Abstract
Writing with next-phrase suggestions powered by large language models is becoming more pervasive by the day. However, research to understand writers' interaction and decision-making processes while engaging with such systems is still emerging. We conducted a qualitative study to shed light on writers' cognitive processes while writing with next-phrase suggestion systems. To do so, we recruited 14 amateur writers to write two reviews each, one without suggestions and one with suggestions. Additionally, we also positively and negatively biased the suggestion system to get a diverse range of instances where writers' opinions and the bias in the language model align or misalign to varying degrees. We found that writers interact with next-phrase suggestions in various complex ways: Writers abstracted and extracted multiple parts of the suggestions and incorporated them within their writing, even when they disagreed with the suggestion as a whole; along with evaluating the suggestions on various criteria. The suggestion system also had various effects on the writing process, such as altering the writer's usual writing plans, leading to higher levels of distraction etc. Based on our qualitative analysis using the cognitive process model of writing by Hayes as a lens, we propose a theoretical model of 'writer-suggestion interaction' for writing with GPT-2 (and causal language models in general) for a movie review writing task, followed by directions for future research and design.
References in corpus (3)
- CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilities
- The Impact of Multiple Parallel Phrase Suggestions on Email Input and Composition Behaviour of Native and Non-Native English Writers
- Grounded Copilot: How Programmers Interact with Code-Generating Models
Cited by in corpus (15)
- Homogenization Effects of Large Language Models on Human Creative Ideation
- A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants
- VISAR: A Human-AI Argumentative Writing Assistant with Visual Programming and Rapid Draft Prototyping
- How Knowledge Workers Think Generative AI Will (Not) Transform Their Industries
- AI Suggestions Homogenize Writing Toward Western Styles and Diminish Cultural Nuances
- Writer-Defined AI Personas for On-Demand Feedback Generation
- A Taxonomy for Human-LLM Interaction Modes: An Initial Exploration
- ReviewFlow: Intelligent Scaffolding to Support Academic Peer Reviewing
- Co-Writing with AI, on Human Terms: Aligning Research with User Demands Across the Writing Process
- Collage is the New Writing: Exploring the Fragmentation of Text and User Interfaces in AI Tools
- ImaginateAR: AI-Assisted In-Situ Authoring in Augmented Reality
- CoCo Matrix: Taxonomy of Cognitive Contributions in Co-writing with Intelligent Agents
- Exploring Mobile Touch Interaction with Large Language Models
- CorpusStudio: Surfacing Emergent Patterns in a Corpus of Prior Work while Writing
- Visual Story-Writing: Writing by Manipulating Visual Representations of Stories