Comparison of compression vs shearing near jamming, for a simple model of athermal frictionless disks in suspension
arXiv:2205.12845 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.107.014901
Abstract
Using a simplified model for a non-Brownian suspension, we numerically study the response of athermal, overdamped, frictionless disks in two dimensions to isotropic and uniaxial compression, as well as to pure {\color{black}and simple} shearing, all at finite constant strain rates . We show that isotropic and uniaxial compression result in the same jamming packing fraction , while pure shear and simple shear induced jamming occurs at a slightly higher , consistent with that found previously for simple shearing. A critical scaling analysis of pure shearing gives critical exponents consistent with those previously found for both isotropic compression and simple shearing. Using orientational order parameters for contact bond directions, we compare the anisotropy of the force and contact networks at both lowest nematic order, as well as higher -fold order.
19 pages, 26 figures, new results for simple shearing added, revised to match version accepted by journal
References in corpus (7)
- Jamming at Zero Temperature and Zero Applied Stress: the Epitome of Disorder
- Stress-strain behavior and geometrical properties of packings of elongated particles
- Unified Theory of Inertial Granular Flows and Non-Brownian Suspensions
- Critical Scaling of Shearing Rheology at the Jamming Transition of Soft Core Frictionless Disks
- Diverging viscosity and soft granular rheology in non-Brownian suspensions
- Growing length and time scales in a suspension of athermal particles
- Universality of stress-anisotropic and stress-isotropic jamming of frictionless spheres in three dimensions: Uniaxial vs isotropic compression