How do Spitzer IRAC Fluxes Compare to HST CALSPEC

Abstract

An accurate tabulation of stellar brightness in physical units is essential for a multitude of scientific endeavors. The HST/CALSPEC database of flux standards contains many stars with spectral coverage in the 0.115--1 \micron\ range with some extensions to longer wavelengths of 1.7 or 2.5 \micron. Modeled flux distributions to 32 \micron\ for calibration of JWST complement the shorter wavelength HST measurements. Understanding the differences between IRAC observations and CALSPEC models is important for science that uses IR fluxes from multiple instruments, including JWST. The absolute flux of Spitzer IRAC photometry at 3.6--8 \micron\ agrees with CALSPEC synthetic photometry to 1\% for the three prime HST standards G191B2B, GD153, and GD71. For a set of 17--22 A-star standards, the average IRAC difference rises from agreement at 3.6 \micron\ to 3.4 $\pm$0.1\% brighter than CALSPEC at 8 \micron. For a smaller set of G-stars, the average of the IRAC photometry falls below CALSPEC by as much as 3.7 $\pm$0.3\% for IRAC1, while one G-star, P330E, is consistent with the A-star ensemble of IRAC/CALSPEC ratios.

7 Figures, AJ in press

References in corpus (6)

• A Grid of NLTE Line-Blanketed Model Atmospheres of Early B-type Stars
• Techniques and Review of Absolute Flux Calibration from the Ultraviolet to the Mid-Infrared
• New Grids of Pure-Hydrogen White-Dwarf NLTE Model Atmospheres \newline and the HST/STIS Flux Calibration
• Spitzer IRAC observations of JWST calibration stars
• Searching for TESS Photometric Variability of Possible JWST Spectrophotometric Standard Stars
• Warm Spitzer IRAC Photometry: dependencies on observing mode and exposure time