Forecasting cosmological parameter constraints using multiple sparsity measurements as tracers of the mass profiles of dark matter haloes
arXiv:2204.06582 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2196
Abstract
The dark matter halo sparsity, i.e. the ratio between spherical halo masses enclosing two different overdensities, provides a non-parametric proxy of the halo mass distribution which has been shown to be a sensitive probe of the cosmological imprint encoded in the mass profile of haloes hosting galaxy clusters. Mass estimations at several overdensities would allow for multiple sparsity measurements, that can potentially retrieve the entirety of the cosmological information imprinted on the halo profile. Here, we investigate the impact of multiple sparsity measurements on the cosmological model parameter inference. For this purpose, we analyse N-body halo catalogues from the Raygal and M2Csims simulations and evaluate the correlations among six different sparsities from Spherical Overdensity halo masses at and (in units of the critical density). Remarkably, sparsities associated to distinct halo mass shells are not highly correlated. This is not the case for sparsities obtained using halo masses estimated from the Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) best-fit profile, that artificially correlates different sparsities to order one. This implies that there is additional information in the mass profile beyond the NFW parametrization and that it can be exploited with multiple sparsities. In particular, from a likelihood analysis of synthetic average sparsity data, we show that cosmological parameter constraints significantly improve when increasing the number of sparsity combinations, though the constraints saturate beyond four sparsity estimates. We forecast constraints for the CHEX-MATE cluster sample and find that systematic mass bias errors mildly impact the parameter inference, though more studies are needed in this direction.
16 pages, 11 figures, novel analyses including marginalisation over baryon systematics, updated to match MNRAS accepted version
References in corpus (24)
- Dynamics of dark energy
- A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team
- Testing X-ray Measurements of Galaxy Clusters with Cosmological Simulations
- The effects of He I 10830 on helium abundance determinations
- The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Anisotropic galaxy clustering in Fourier-space
- Cosmology and Astrophysics from Relaxed Galaxy Clusters II: Cosmological Constraints
- Comparing Tip of the Red Giant Branch Distance Scales: An Independent Reduction of the Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program and the Value of the Hubble Constant
- Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: A 2.7% measurement of Baryon Acoustic Oscillation distance scale at redshift 0.835
- Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cluster Abundances, Weak Lensing, and Galaxy Correlations
- AMICO galaxy clusters in KiDS-DR3: cosmological constraints from counts and stacked weak-lensing
- On the impact of baryons on the halo mass function, bias, and cluster cosmology
- Cosmological Constraints from Gas Mass Fractions of Massive, Relaxed Galaxy Clusters
- The mass-concentration relation in lensing clusters: the role of statistical biases and selection effects
- The gravitational field of X-COP galaxy clusters
- C-Cluster Clustering Cosmology I. New constraints on the cosmic growth rate at z~0.3 from redshift-space clustering anisotropies
- Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Cluster Sparsity, Cluster Gas Mass Fraction and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Data
- Dark Matter Halos from the Inside Out
- Internal dark matter structure of the most massive galaxy clusters
- The RayGalGroupSims cosmological simulation suite for the study of relativistic effects: an application to lensing-matter clustering statistics
- Dark Matter Halo Sparsity of Modified Gravity Scenarios
- Average Dark Matter Halo Sparsity Relations as Consistency Check of Mass Estimates in Galaxy Cluster Samples
- Why are we still using 3D masses for cluster cosmology?
- Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmology with moments of weak lensing mass maps
- Timing the last major merger of galaxy clusters with large halo sparsity