A Separation Logic for Negative Dependence
arXiv:2111.14917 · doi:10.1145/3498719
Abstract
Formal reasoning about hashing-based probabilistic data structures often requires reasoning about random variables where when one variable gets larger (such as the number of elements hashed into one bucket), the others tend to be smaller (like the number of elements hashed into the other buckets). This is an example of negative dependence, a generalization of probabilistic independence that has recently found interesting applications in algorithm design and machine learning. Despite the usefulness of negative dependence for the analyses of probabilistic data structures, existing verification methods cannot establish this property for randomized programs. To fill this gap, we design LINA, a probabilistic separation logic for reasoning about negative dependence. Following recent works on probabilistic separation logic using separating conjunction to reason about the probabilistic independence of random variables, we use separating conjunction to reason about negative dependence. Our assertion logic features two separating conjunctions, one for independence and one for negative dependence. We generalize the logic of bunched implications (BI) to support multiple separating conjunctions, and provide a sound and complete proof system. Notably, the semantics for separating conjunction relies on a non-deterministic, rather than partial, operation for combining resources. By drawing on closure properties for negative dependence, our program logic supports a Frame-like rule for negative dependence and monotone operations. We demonstrate how LINA can verify probabilistic properties of hash-based data structures and balls-into-bins processes.
61 pages, 9 figures, to appear in Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages (POPL 2022)
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (10)
- Asynchronous Probabilistic Couplings in Higher-Order Separation Logic
- A Separation Logic for Negative Dependence
- Outcome Separation Logic: Local Reasoning for Correctness and Incorrectness with Computational Effects
- Error Credits: Resourceful Reasoning about Error Bounds for Higher-Order Probabilistic Programs
- Approximate Relational Reasoning for Higher-Order Probabilistic Programs
- Tachis: Higher-Order Separation Logic with Credits for Expected Costs
- Bluebell: An Alliance of Relational Lifting and Independence For Probabilistic Reasoning
- Probabilistic Concurrent Reasoning in Outcome Logic: Independence, Conditioning, and Invariants
- Bunched Fuzz: Sensitivity for Vector Metrics
- Derandomization with Pseudorandomness