paper

Measurement-driven navigation in many-body Hilbert space: Active-decision steering

arXiv:2111.09306 · doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.020347

Abstract

The challenge of preparing a system in a designated state spans diverse facets of quantum mechanics. To complete this task of steering quantum states, one can employ quantum control through a sequence of generalized measurements which direct the system towards the target state. In an active version of this protocol, the obtained measurement readouts are used to adjust the protocol on-the-go. This enables a sped-up performance relative to the passive version of the protocol, where no active adjustments are included. In this work, we consider such active measurement-driven steering as applied to the challenging case of many-body quantum systems. For helpful decision-making strategies, we offer Hilbert-space-orientation techniques, comparable to those used in navigation. The first one is to tie the active-decision protocol to the greedy accumulation of the cost function, such as the target state fidelity. We show the potential of a significant speedup, employing this greedy approach to a broad family of Matrix Product State targets. For system sizes considered here, an average value of the speedup factor across this family settles about , for some targets even reaching a few thousands. We also identify a subclass of Matrix Product State targets, for which the value of increases with system size. In addition to the greedy approach, the second wayfinding technique is to map out the available measurement actions onto a Quantum State Machine. A decision-making protocol can be based on such a representation, using semiclassical heuristics. This State Machine-based approach can be applied to a more restricted set of targets, sometimes offering advantages over the cost function-based method. We give an example of a W-state preparation which is accelerated with this method by , outperforming the greedy protocol for this target.

20 pages, 10 figures; v.3 - added analysis of random Matrix Product States preparation; improved the choice of system-detector couplings; added comparative analysis of methods of Sections IV and V; discussed the effect of experimentally expected imperfections

References in corpus (15)

Cited by in corpus (21)