The role of representational conventions in assessing the empirical significance of symmetries

Abstract

This paper explicates the direct empirical significance (DES) of symmetries in gauge theory, with comparisons to classical mechanics. Given a physical system composed of subsystems, such significance is to be awarded to physical differences of the composite system that arise from symmetries acting solely on its subsystems. So my overarching main question is: can DES be associated to the local gauge symmetries, acting solely on subsystems? In local gauge theories, any quantity with physical significance must be a gauge-invariant quantity. To attack the question of DES from this gauge-invariant angle, we require a split of the state into its physical and its representational content: a split that is relative to a representational convention, or a gauge-fixing. Using this method, we propose a rigorous definition of DES, valid for any state. This definition fills the gaps in influential previous construals of DES. In particular, Wallace's need to specialize to `generic' states is explained and dispensed with.

arXiv comment36 pages, 16 page appendix, 2 figures

References in corpus (10)

• 3+1 Formalism and Bases of Numerical Relativity
• Entanglement entropy in gauge theories and the holographic principle for electric strings
• Edge modes and corner ambiguities in 3d Chern-Simons theory and gravity
• A unified geometric framework for boundary charges and dressings: non-Abelian theory and matter
• The Observer's Ghost: a field-space connection-form and its application to gauge theories and general relativity
• A Unified Geometric Framework for Boundary Charges and Particle Dressings
• Gauging the Boundary in Field-space
• Asymptotic Symmetry Groups of Long-Ranged Gauge Configurations
• Edge modes without edge modes
• Deflating the Aharonov-Bohm Effect