Self-supervised Learning is More Robust to Dataset Imbalance

Abstract

Self-supervised learning (SSL) is a scalable way to learn general visual representations since it learns without labels. However, large-scale unlabeled datasets in the wild often have long-tailed label distributions, where we know little about the behavior of SSL. In this work, we systematically investigate self-supervised learning under dataset imbalance. First, we find out via extensive experiments that off-the-shelf self-supervised representations are already more robust to class imbalance than supervised representations. The performance gap between balanced and imbalanced pre-training with SSL is significantly smaller than the gap with supervised learning, across sample sizes, for both in-domain and, especially, out-of-domain evaluation. Second, towards understanding the robustness of SSL, we hypothesize that SSL learns richer features from frequent data: it may learn label-irrelevant-but-transferable features that help classify the rare classes and downstream tasks. In contrast, supervised learning has no incentive to learn features irrelevant to the labels from frequent examples. We validate this hypothesis with semi-synthetic experiments and theoretical analyses on a simplified setting. Third, inspired by the theoretical insights, we devise a re-weighted regularization technique that consistently improves the SSL representation quality on imbalanced datasets with several evaluation criteria, closing the small gap between balanced and imbalanced datasets with the same number of examples.

References in corpus (8)

• Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learning
• Self-supervised Pretraining of Visual Features in the Wild
• Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Loss
• Understanding self-supervised Learning Dynamics without Contrastive Pairs
• Why Do Pretrained Language Models Help in Downstream Tasks? An Analysis of Head and Prompt Tuning
• Contrastive estimation reveals topic posterior information to linear models
• Shape Matters: Understanding the Implicit Bias of the Noise Covariance
• Understanding the role of importance weighting for deep learning

Cited by in corpus (2)

• Self-supervised remote sensing feature learning: Learning Paradigms, Challenges, and Future Works
• Label-free Monitoring of Self-Supervised Learning Progress