Cosmological Constraints from Weak Lensing Peaks: Can Halo Models Accurately Predict Peak Counts?
arXiv:2109.00547 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.023505
Abstract
In order to extract full cosmological information from next-generation large and high-precision weak lensing (WL) surveys (e.g. Euclid, Roman, LSST), higher-order statistics that probe the small-scale, non-linear regime of large scale structure (LSS) need to be utilized. WL peak counts, which trace overdensities in the cosmic web, are one promising and simple statistic for constraining cosmological parameters. The physical origin of WL peaks have previously been linked to dark matter halos along the line of sight and this peak-halo connection has been used to develop various semi-analytic halo-based models for predicting peak counts. Here, we study the origin of WL peaks and the effectiveness of halo-based models for WL peak counts using a suite of ray-tracing N-body simulations. We compare WL peaks in convergence maps from the full simulations to those in maps created from only particles associated with halos -- the latter playing the role of a "perfect" halo model. We find that while halo-only contributions are able to replicate peak counts qualitatively well, halos do not explain all WL peaks. Halos particularly underpredict negative peaks, which are associated with local overdensities in large-scale underdense regions along the line of sight. In addition, neglecting non-halo contributions to peaks counts leads to a significant bias on the parameters (, ) for surveys larger than 100 deg. We conclude that other elements of the cosmic web, outside and far away from dark matter halos, need to be incorporated into models of WL peaks in order to infer unbiased cosmological constraints.
arXiv comment15 pages, 15 figures, updated to match PRD version
References in corpus (44)
- SciPy 1.0--Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python
- Array Programming with NumPy
- Astropy: A Community Python Package for Astronomy
- The Astropy Project: Building an inclusive, open-science project and status of the v2.0 core package
- The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2
- Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution
- Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models
- Weak Gravitational Lensing
- The Rockstar Phase-Space Temporal Halo Finder and the Velocity Offsets of Cluster Cores
- Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
- KiDS-450: Cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
- Why your model parameter confidences might be too optimistic -- unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrix
- Cosmology from cosmic shear power spectra with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam first-year data
- Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
- Weak Gravitational Lensing by Large-Scale Structure
- Weak Gravitational Lensing and its Cosmological Applications
- Cosmological parameters from lensing power spectrum and bispectrum tomography
- CFHTLenS: Combined probe cosmological model comparison using 2D weak gravitational lensing
- The Three-Point Correlation Function in Cosmology
- Cosmology with the shear-peak statistics
- Probing Cosmology with Weak Lensing Peak Counts
- Non-Gaussian information from weak lensing data via deep learning
- Probing Cosmology with Weak Lensing Minkowski Functionals
- Statistics of Dark Matter Halos from Gravitational Lensing
- Emulating the CFHTLenS Weak Lensing data: Cosmological Constraints from moments and Minkowski functionals
- Cosmological Information in Weak Lensing Peaks
- Noisy weak-lensing convergence peak statistics near clusters of galaxies and beyond
- A new model to predict weak-lensing peak counts II. Parameter constraint strategies
- A new model to predict weak-lensing peak counts I. Comparison with -body Simulations
- From Weak Lensing to non-Gaussianity via Minkowski Functionals
- An analytic approach to number counts of weak-lensing peak detections
- Statistical and Systematic Errors in Measurement of Weak-Lensing Minkowski Functionals: Application to Canada-France-Hawaii Lensing Survey
- Mocking the Weak Lensing universe: the LensTools python computing package
- The Weak Lensing Bispectrum
- Baryon impact on weak lensing peaks and power spectrum: low-bias statistics and self-calibration in future surveys
- The Origin of Weak Lensing Convergence Peaks
- Weak Lensing Minima and Peaks: Cosmological Constraints and the Impact of Baryons
- Do dark matter halos explain lensing peaks?
- Fast Weak Lensing Simulations with Halo Model
- The Impact of Baryons on Cosmological Inference from Weak Lensing Statistics
- The Halo Void (Dust) Model of Large Scale Structure
- Weak Lensing Peaks in Simulated Light-Cones: Investigating the Coupling between Dark Matter and Dark Energy
- The Correspondence between Convergence Peaks from Weak Lensing and Massive Dark Matter Haloes
- Projection effects of large-scale structures on weak-lensing peak abundances
Cited by in corpus (7)
- Cosmological Studies from HSC-SSP Tomographic Weak Lensing Peak Abundances
- The FLAMINGO project: Baryonic impact on weak gravitational lensing convergence peak counts
- Comparing weak lensing peak counts in baryonic correction models to hydrodynamical simulations
- Constraining cosmology with thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich maps: Minkowski functionals, peaks, minima, and moments
- Neural style transfer of weak lensing mass maps
- Cosmological constraints from HSC Y1 lensing convergence PDF
- Impact of weak-lensing mass-mapping algorithms on cosmology inference