The final orbital separation in common envelope evolution

Abstract

In the majority of population synthesis calculations of close binary stars, the common envelope (CE) phase is modeled using a standard prescription based upon the conservation of energy, known as the alpha prescription. In this prescription, the orbital separation of the secondary and giant core at the end of the CE phase is taken to be the orbital separation when the envelope becomes unbound. However, recent observations of planetary nebulae with binary cores (BPNe), believed to be the immediate products of CE evolution, indicate orbital periods that are significantly shorter than predicted by population synthesis models using the alpha prescription. We argue that unbinding the envelope provides a necessary, but not sufficient, condition to escape a merger during CE evolution. The spiral-in of the secondary must also be halted. This requires the additional dynamical constraint that the frictional torque on the secondary be reduced to approximately zero. In this paper, we undertake a preliminary examination of the effect of adding this dynamical constraint in population synthesis calculations of BPNe. We assume that the frictional torque will be sufficiently reduced when the secondary enters a region within the giant where the mass-radius profile is flat. We crudely estimate the location of this region as a function of the core mass based upon existing stellar models of AGB stars between 1 and 7 solar masses. We calculate a theoretical orbital period distribution of BPNe using a population synthesis code that incorporates this dynamical constraint along with the alpha prescription.

arXiv comment4 pages, 4 figures, accepted by Astronomy and Astrophysics Letters

References in corpus (18)

• Common Envelope Evolution: Where we stand and how we can move forward
• Post-common-envelope binaries from SDSS. IX: Constraining the common-envelope efficiency
• An AMR Study of the Common Envelope Phase of Binary Evolution
• Simulating the Common Envelope Phase of a Red Giant Using SPH and Uniform Grid Codes
• Binary Planetary Nebulae Nuclei towards the Galactic Bulge. I. Sample Discovery, Period Distribution and Binary Fraction
• Double Core Evolution X. Through the Envelope Ejection Phase
• Hydrodynamic moving-mesh simulations of the common envelope phase in binary stellar systems
• Binary stars as the key to understanding planetary nebulae
• Do most planetary nebulae derive from binaries? I Population synthesis model of the galactic planetary nebula population produced by singlestars and binaries
• A comprehensive population synthesis study of post-common envelope binaries
• Binary central stars of PN discovered through photometric variability. I. What we know and what we would like to find out
• Common envelope events with low-mass giants: understanding the energy budget
• Common envelope: on the mass and the fate of the remnant
• Speaking with one voice: simulations and observations discuss the common envelope $\alpha$ parameter
• Common-envelope evolution with an asymptotic giant branch star
• Planetary nebulae after common-envelope phases initiated by low-mass red giants
• Binary Central Stars of Planetary Nebulae Discovered Through Photometric Variability V: The Central Stars of HaTr 7 and ESO 330-9
• Population Synthesis of Common Envelope Mergers: I. Giant Stars with Stellar or Substellar Companions

Cited by in corpus (1)

• The Common Envelope Evolution Outcome -- A Case Study on Hot Subdwarf B Stars