Quality Gatekeepers: Investigating the Effects ofCode Review Bots on Pull Request Activities
arXiv:2103.13547 · doi:10.1007/s10664-022-10130-9
Abstract
Software bots have been facilitating several development activities in Open Source Software (OSS) projects, including code review. However, these bots may bring unexpected impacts to group dynamics, as frequently occurs with new technology adoption. Understanding and anticipating such effects is important for planning and management. To analyze these effects, we investigate how several activity indicators change after the adoption of a code review bot. We employed a regression discontinuity design on 1,194 software projects from GitHub. We also interviewed 12 practitioners, including open-source maintainers and contributors. Our results indicate that the adoption of code review bots increases the number of monthly merged pull requests, decreases monthly non-merged pull requests, and decreases communication among developers. From the developers' perspective, these effects are explained by the transparency and confidence the bot comments introduce, in addition to the changes in the discussion focused on pull requests. Practitioners and maintainers may leverage our results to understand, or even predict, bot effects on their projects.
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (5)
- GitHub Actions: The Impact on the Pull Request Process
- State-Of-The-Practice in Quality Assurance in Java-Based Open Source Software Development
- Motivations, Challenges, Best Practices, and Benefits for Bots and Conversational Agents in Software Engineering: A Multivocal Literature Review
- Understanding the Helpfulness of Stale Bot for Pull-based Development: An Empirical Study of 20 Large Open-Source Projects
- The Death Spiral of Open Source Projects: A Post-Mortem Analysis of Pull Request Workflow Dynamics