No-Go Theorems: What Are They Good For?
arXiv:2103.03491 · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.01.005
Abstract
No-go theorems have played an important role in the development and assessment of scientific theories. They have stopped whole research programs and have given rise to strong ontological commitments. Given the importance they obviously have had in physics and philosophy of physics and the huge amount of literature on the consequences of specific no-go theorems, there has been relatively little attention to the more abstract assessment of no-go theorems as a tool in theory development. We will here provide this abstract assessment of no-go theorems and conclude that the methodological implications one may draw from no-go theorems are in disagreement with the implications that have often been drawn from them in the history of science.
34 pages
References in corpus (11)
- A Method for Simulating Chiral Fermions on the Lattice
- Hidden Variables and the Two Theorems of John Bell
- Chiral Fermions from Lattice Boundaries
- Characterizing quantum theory in terms of information-theoretic constraints
- How higher-spin gravity surpasses the spin two barrier: no-go theorems versus yes-go examples
- What Bell Did
- Von Neumann's 'No Hidden Variables' Proof: A Re-Appraisal
- On the Significance of the Gottesman-Knill Theorem
- Against the No-Go Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics
- On Noncontextual, Non-Kolmogorovian Hidden Variable Theories
- Reconsidering No-Go Theorems from a Practical Perspective