A Composite Likelihood Approach for Inference under Photometric Redshift Uncertainty
arXiv:2101.01184 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3290
Abstract
Obtaining accurately calibrated redshift distributions of photometric samples is one of the great challenges in photometric surveys like LSST, Euclid, HSC, KiDS, and DES. We present an inference methodology that combines the redshift information from the galaxy photometry with constraints from two-point functions, utilizing cross-correlations with spatially overlapping spectroscopic samples, and illustrate the approach on CosmoDC2 simulations. Our likelihood framework is designed to integrate directly into a typical large-scale structure and weak lensing analysis based on two-point functions. We discuss efficient and accurate inference techniques that allow us to scale the method to the large samples of galaxies to be expected in LSST. We consider statistical challenges like the parametrization of redshift systematics, discuss and evaluate techniques to regularize the sample redshift distributions, and investigate techniques that can help to detect and calibrate sources of systematic error using posterior predictive checks. We evaluate and forecast photometric redshift performance using data from the CosmoDC2 simulations, within which we mimic a DESI-like spectroscopic calibration sample for cross-correlations. Using a combination of spatial cross-correlations and photometry, we show that we can provide calibration of the mean of the sample redshift distribution to an accuracy of at least 0.002(1+z), consistent with the LSST-Y1 science requirements for weak lensing and large-scale structure probes.
Updated to match the version accepted by the MNRAS, 23 pages, 9 figures, 2 tables
References in corpus (17)
- Array Programming with NumPy
- Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report
- KiDS-450 + 2dFLenS: Cosmological parameter constraints from weak gravitational lensing tomography and overlapping redshift-space galaxy clustering
- Calibrating Redshift Distributions Beyond Spectroscopic Limits with Cross-Correlations
- The Zurich Extragalactic Bayesian Redshift Analyzer (ZEBRA) and its first application: COSMOS
- Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Redshift Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Galaxies
- Joining Forces of Bayesian and Frequentist Methodology: A Study for Inference in the Presence of Non-Identifiability
- Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Clustering Redshifts -- Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Redshift Distributions with redMaGiC and BOSS/eBOSS
- Preliminary Target Selection for the DESI Luminous Red Galaxy (LRG) Sample
- The-wiZZ: Clustering redshift estimation for everyone
- Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Calibration of Lens Sample Redshift Distributions using Clustering Redshifts with BOSS/eBOSS
- 2dFLenS and KiDS: Determining source redshift distributions with cross-correlations
- Data augmentation for machine learning redshifts applied to SDSS galaxies
- Propagating sample variance uncertainties in redshift calibration: simulations, theory and application to the COSMOS2015 data
- Photometric Redshifts with the LSST II: The Impact of Near-Infrared and Near-Ultraviolet Photometry
- A Joint Analysis for Cosmology and Photometric Redshift Calculation Using Cross Correlations
- Estimating Spectra from Photometry
Cited by in corpus (5)
- Cosmological Constraint Precision of the Photometric and Spectroscopic Multi-probe Surveys of China Space Station Telescope (CSST)
- Weak Lensing Tomographic Redshift Distribution Inference for the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program three-year shape catalogue
- Photometric Redshift Uncertainties in Weak Gravitational Lensing Shear Analysis: Models and Marginalization
- How not to obtain the redshift distribution from probabilistic redshift estimates: Under what conditions is it not inappropriate to estimate the redshift distribution N(z) by stacking photo-z PDFs?
- Photometric Redshift Estimation with Convolutional Neural Networks and Galaxy Images: A Case Study of Resolving Biases in Data-Driven Methods