Wildcard error: Quantifying unmodeled errors in quantum processors

Abstract

Error models for quantum computing processors describe their deviation from ideal behavior and predict the consequences in applications. But those processors' experimental behavior -- the observed outcome statistics of quantum circuits -- are rarely consistent with error models, even in characterization experiments like randomized benchmarking (RB) or gate set tomography (GST), where the error model was specifically extracted from the data in question. We show how to resolve these inconsistencies, and quantify the rate of unmodeled errors, by augmenting error models with a parameterized wildcard error model. Adding wildcard error to an error model relaxes and weakens its predictions in a controlled way. The amount of wildcard error required to restore consistency with data quantifies how much unmodeled error was observed, in a way that facilitates direct comparison to standard gate error rates. Using both simulated and experimental data, we show how to use wildcard error to reconcile error models derived from RB and GST experiments with inconsistent data, to capture non-Markovianity, and to quantify all of a processor's observed error.

4.5 pages, 4 figures, one new idea

References in corpus (6)

• Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC
• Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Gates
• Robust randomized benchmarking of quantum processes
• Approximation of real error channels by Clifford channels and Pauli measurements
• Robust error bars for quantum tomography
• QVECTOR: an algorithm for device-tailored quantum error correction