How long does it take to implement a projective measurement?
arXiv:2011.13254 · doi:10.1088/1361-6404/ac5a7a
Abstract
According to the Schrödinger equation, a closed quantum system evolves continuously in time. If it is subject to a measurement however, its state changes randomly and discontinuously, which is mathematically described by the projection postulate. But how long does it take for this discontinuous change to occur? Based on simple estimates, whose validity rests solely on the fact that all fundamental forces in nature are finite-ranged, we show that the implementation of a quantum measurement requires a minimum time. This time scales proportionally with the diameter of the quantum mechanical object, on which the measured observable acts non-trivially, with the proportionality constant being around s/m. We confirm our bound by comparison with experimentally reported measurement times for different platforms. We give a pedagogical exposition of our argumentation introducing along the way modern concepts such as ancilla-based measurements, the quantum speed limit, and Lieb-Robinson velocity bounds.
arXiv comment9 pages with 5 figures incl. short appendix. Pedagogical and accepted version
References in corpus (16)
- Single-shot read-out of an individual electron spin in a quantum dot
- Observation of high coherence in Josephson junction qubits measured in a three-dimensional circuit QED architecture
- The maximum speed of dynamical evolution
- Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg's uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control
- How Quantum Mechanics can consistently describe the use of itself
- Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself
- Macroscopic quantum states: measures, fragility and implementations
- Comparison of Two Independent Sr Optical Clocks with 1e-17 Stability at 10^3 s
- Feedback control of a solid-state qubit using high-fidelity projective measurement
- Experimental realization of quantum zeno dynamics
- Ideal Projective Measurements Have Infinite Resource Costs
- Quantum nondemolition measurement of an electron spin qubit
- Macroscopic superpositions require tremendous measurement devices
- Weak Measurement of Superconducting Qubit Reconciles Incompatible Operators
- All macroscopic quantum states are fragile and hard to prepare
- Tracking the dynamics of an ideal quantum measurement