Scientific Objectivity and its Limits
arXiv:2010.01013 · doi:10.1086/716169
Abstract
Measurement outcomes provide data for a physical theory. Unless they are objective they support no objective scientific knowledge. So the outcome of a quantum measurement must be an objective physical fact. But recent arguments purport to show that if quantum theory is universally applicable then there is no such fact. This calls for a reappraisal of the notions of fact and objectivity. If quantum theory is universally applicable the facts about the physical world include a fact about each quantum measurement outcome. These physical facts lack an ideal kind of objectivity but their more modest objectivity is all that science needs.
arXiv comment20 pages, no figures. To appear in the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science: manuscript without copy editing or final corrections available online at https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/716169
References in corpus (10)
- An Introduction to QBism with an Application to the Locality of Quantum Mechanics
- How Quantum Mechanics can consistently describe the use of itself
- Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself
- A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner's friend paradox
- A no-go theorem for observer-independent facts
- Quantum Theory and the Limits of Objectivity
- Quantum States as Objective Informational Bridges
- When Greenberger, Horne and Zeilinger meet Wigner's Friend
- Quantum Reality, Perspectivalism and Covariance
- On the Hardness of Detecting Macroscopic Superpositions