Interpreting Internal Consistency of DES Measurements

Abstract

Bayesian evidence ratios are widely used to quantify the statistical consistency between different experiments. However, since the evidence ratio is prior dependent, the precise translation between its value and the degree of concordance/discordance requires additional information. The most commonly adopted metric, the Jeffreys scale, can falsely suggest agreement between datasets when priors are chosen to be sufficiently wide. In this work, we examine evidence ratios in a DES-Y1 simulated analysis, focusing on the internal consistency between weak lensing and galaxy clustering. We study two scenarios using simulated data in controlled experiments. First, we calibrate the expected evidence ratio distribution given noise realizations around the best fit DES-Y1 $\Lambda$CDM cosmology. Second, we show the behavior of evidence ratios for noiseless fiducial data vectors simulated using a modified gravity model, which generates internal tension in the $\Lambda$CDM analysis. We show that the choice of prior could conceal the discrepancies between weak lensing and galaxy clustering induced by such models and that the evidence ratio in a DES-Y1 study is, indeed, biased towards agreement.

arXiv comment19 figures

References in corpus (67)

• Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
• Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae
• emcee: The MCMC Hammer
• Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models
• LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
• The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample
• The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed Type Ia Supernovae from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from The Combined Pantheon Sample
• Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe
• Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter
• The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes
• Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics Beyond LambdaCDM
• Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
• Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe
• Revising the Halofit Model for the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum
• Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report
• Importance Nested Sampling and the MultiNest Algorithm
• KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Cosmic shear constraints and comparison between two point statistics
• The Hubble Hunter's Guide
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cosmic Shear
• Planck evidence for a closed Universe and a possible crisis for cosmology
• Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): end of survey report and data release 2
• Efficient sampling of fast and slow cosmological parameters
• Cosmology from cosmic shear power spectra with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam first-year data
• CMB power spectrum parameter degeneracies in the era of precision cosmology
• The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview
• PolyChord: next-generation nested sampling
• Dark energy constraints from cosmic shear power spectra: impact of intrinsic alignments on photometric redshift requirements
• The Cosmological Analysis of the SDSS/BOSS data from the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure
• Report of the Dark Energy Task Force
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
• The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) IV: Efficient implementation of non-cold relics
• CMB-S4 Science Book, First Edition
• First Cosmology Results using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: Constraints on Cosmological Parameters
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: A Precise H0 Measurement from DES Y1, BAO, and D/H Data
• CosmoLike - Cosmological Likelihood Analyses for Photometric Galaxy Surveys
• Cosmic Complementarity: H_0 and Omega_m from Combining CMB Experiments and Redshift Surveys
• The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: The polarization-sensitive ACTPol instrument
• Concordance and Discordance in Cosmology
• redMaGiC: Selecting Luminous Red Galaxies from the DES Science Verification Data
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Weak Lensing Shape Catalogues
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Redshift distributions of the weak lensing source galaxies
• CFHTLenS: Testing the Laws of Gravity with Tomographic Weak Lensing and Redshift Space Distortions
• The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope: 100 Hubbles for the 2020s
• Cosmological Parameters and Neutrino Masses from the Final Planck and Full-Shape BOSS Data
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy clustering for combined probes
• Is the Jeffreys' scale a reliable tool for Bayesian model comparison in cosmology?
• The Complete Calibration of the Color-Redshift Relation (C3R2) Survey: Survey Overview and Data Release 1
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Multi-Probe Methodology and Simulated Likelihood Analyses
• SPTpol: an instrument for CMB polarization measurements with the South Pole Telescope
• Cosmology with the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope -- Multi-Probe Strategies
• The SDSS-IV extended Baryonic Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Luminous Red Galaxy Target Selection
• Quantifying tensions in cosmological parameters: Interpreting the DES evidence ratio
• Bayesian evidence as a tool for comparing datasets
• anesthetic: nested sampling visualisation
• Findings of the Joint Dark Energy Mission Figure of Merit Science Working Group
• The linear growth rate of structure in Parametrized Post Friedmannian Universes
• The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) III: Comparision with CAMB for LambdaCDM
• Taking Bigger Metropolis Steps by Dragging Fast Variables
• Information Gains from Cosmic Microwave Background Experiments
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Calibration of redMaGiC Redshift Distributions in DES and SDSS from Cross-Correlations
• Quantifying Suspiciousness Within Correlated Data Sets
• Quantifying Concordance in Cosmology
• Marginal Likelihoods from Monte Carlo Markov Chains
• Non-Gaussianity in the Weak Lensing Correlation Function Likelihood -- Implications for Cosmological Parameter Biases
• The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI)
• Cosmic complementarity: combining CMB and supernova observations

Cited by in corpus (3)

• Assessing tension metrics with Dark Energy Survey and Planck data
• Accelerating cosmological inference with Gaussian processes and neural networks -- an application to LSST Y1 weak lensing and galaxy clustering
• Growth and Geometry Split in Light of the DES-Y3 Survey