Point estimates, Simpson's paradox and nonergodicity in biological sciences
arXiv:2009.00756 · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.017
Abstract
Modern biomedical, behavioral and psychological inference about cause-effect relationships respects an ergodic assumption, that is, that mean response of representative samples allow predictions about individual members of those samples. Recent empirical evidence in all of the same fields indicates systematic violations of the ergodic assumption. Indeed, violation of ergodicity in biomedical, behavioral and psychological causes is precisely the inspiration behind our research inquiry. Here, we review the long term costs to scientific progress in these domains and a practical way forward. Specifically, we advocate the use of statistical measures that can themselves encode the degree and type of non-ergodicity in measurements. Taking such steps will lead to a paradigm shift, allowing researchers to investigate the nonstationary, far-from-equilibrium processes that characterize the creativity and emergence of biological and psychological behavior.
arXiv comment22 pages, 3 figures
References in corpus (10)
- Can parametric statistical methods be trusted for fMRI based group studies?
- Detrended Cross-Correlation Analysis: A New Method for Analyzing Two Non-stationary Time Series
- Random Time-Scale Invariant Diffusion and Transport Coefficients
- Ergodic Properties of Fractional Brownian-Langevin Motion
- Weak ergodicity breaking of receptor motion in living cells stemming from random diffusivity
- Evaluating gambles using dynamics
- Aging dynamics in interacting many-body systems
- Optimal leverage from non-ergodicity
- Computational Social Scientist Beware: Simpson's Paradox in Behavioral Data
- A recipe for irreproducible results