Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

This paper explores the important role of critical science, and in particular of post-colonial and decolonial theories, in understanding and shaping the ongoing advances in artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is viewed as amongst the technological advances that will reshape modern societies and their relations. Whilst the design and deployment of systems that continually adapt holds the promise of far-reaching positive change, they simultaneously pose significant risks, especially to already vulnerable peoples. Values and power are central to this discussion. Decolonial theories use historical hindsight to explain patterns of power that shape our intellectual, political, economic, and social world. By embedding a decolonial critical approach within its technical practice, AI communities can develop foresight and tactics that can better align research and technology development with established ethical principles, centring vulnerable peoples who continue to bear the brunt of negative impacts of innovation and scientific progress. We highlight problematic applications that are instances of coloniality, and using a decolonial lens, submit three tactics that can form a decolonial field of artificial intelligence: creating a critical technical practice of AI, seeking reverse tutelage and reverse pedagogies, and the renewal of affective and political communities. The years ahead will usher in a wave of new scientific breakthroughs and technologies driven by AI research, making it incumbent upon AI communities to strengthen the social contract through ethical foresight and the multiplicity of intellectual perspectives available to us; ultimately supporting future technologies that enable greater well-being, with the goal of beneficence and justice for all.

28 Pages. Accepted, to appear in: Philosophy and Technology (405), Springer. Submitted 16 January, Accepted 26 May 2020

References in corpus (2)

• Towards a Critical Race Methodology in Algorithmic Fairness
• A Causal Bayesian Networks Viewpoint on Fairness

Cited by in corpus (23)

• Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systems
• Power to the People? Opportunities and Challenges for Participatory AI
• The Forgotten Margins of AI Ethics
• Envisioning Communities: A Participatory Approach Towards AI for Social Good
• Charting the Sociotechnical Gap in Explainable AI: A Framework to Address the Gap in XAI
• `It is currently hodgepodge'': Examining AI/ML Practitioners' Challenges during Co-production of Responsible AI Values
• Decolonial AI as Disenclosure
• Subverting machines, fluctuating identities: Re-learning human categorization
• A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure
• Non-portability of Algorithmic Fairness in India
• Foundations for the Future: Institution building for the purpose of Artificial Intelligence governance
• The Centers and Margins of Modeling Humans in Well-being Technologies: A Decentering Approach
• Artificial Intelligence Ethics: An Inclusive Global Discourse?
• Anticipatory Ethics and the Role of Uncertainty
• The Arc of the Data Scientific Universe
• We Haven't Gone Paperless Yet: Why the Printing Press Can Help Us Understand Data and AI
• "Business on WhatsApp is tough now -- but am I really a businesswoman?" Exploring Challenges with Adapting to Changes in WhatsApp Business
• Beyond traditional assumptions in fair machine learning
• Insiders and Outsiders in Research on Machine Learning and Society
• Toward Substantive Intersectional Algorithmic Fairness: Desiderata for a Feminist Approach
• Towards an Abolitionist AI: the role of Historically Black Colleges and Universities
• A Sociotechnical View of Algorithmic Fairness
• AI in the "Real World": Examining the Impact of AI Deployment in Low-Resource Contexts