Towards control of opinion diversity by introducing zealots into a polarised social group
arXiv:2006.07265 · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-93413-2_29
Abstract
We explore a method to influence or even control the diversity of opinions within a polarised social group. We leverage the voter model in which users hold binary opinions and repeatedly update their beliefs based on others they connect with. Stubborn agents who never change their minds ("zealots") are also disseminated through the network, which is modelled by a connected graph. Building on earlier results, we provide a closed-form expression for the average opinion of the group at equilibrium. This leads us to a strategy to inject zealots into a polarised network in order to shift the average opinion towards any target value. We account for the possible presence of a backfire effect, which may lead the group to react negatively and reinforce its level of polarisation in response. Our results are supported by numerical experiments on synthetic data.
arXiv comment14 pages, 4 figures
References in corpus (6)
- Voter Models on Heterogeneous Networks
- On the Role of Zealotry in the Voter Model
- Zealotry Effects on Opinion Dynamics in the Adaptive Voter Model
- Forecasting elections results via the voter model with stubborn nodes
- Voter models on subcritical inhomogeneous random graphs
- Disagreement and Polarization in Two-Party Social Networks