SpecPhot: A Comparison of Spectroscopic and Photometric Exoplanet Follow-Up Methods

Abstract

We set out a simulation to explore the follow-up of exoplanet candidates. We look at comparing photometric (transit method) and spectroscopic (Doppler shift method) techniques using three instruments: NGTS, HARPS and CORALIE. We take into account precision of follow-up and required observing time in attempt to rank each method for a given set of planetary system parameters. The methods are assessed on two criteria, SNR of the detection and follow-up time before characterisation. We find that different follow-up techniques are preferred for different regions of parameter space. For SNR we find that the ratio of spectroscopic to photometric SNR for a given system goes like $R_p/P^{\frac{1}{3}}$. For follow-up time we find that photometry is favoured for the shortest period systems ($<10$ d) as well as systems with small planet radii. Spectroscopy is then preferred for systems with larger radius, and thus more massive, planets (given our assumed mass-radius relationship). Finally, we attempt to account for availability of telescopes and weight the two methods accordingly.

10 pages, 7 figures. Accepted for publication in MNRAS

References in corpus (4)

• The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite
• The K2 Mission: Characterization and Early results
• Living with Neighbors. I. Observational Clues to Hydrodynamic Impact of Neighboring Galaxies on Star Formation
• A New Yield Simulator for Transiting Planets and False Positives: Application to the Next Generation Transit Survey

Cited by in corpus (2)

• Resolving period aliases for TESS monotransits recovered during the extended mission
• Following up TESS Single Transits With Archival Photometry and Radial Velocities