Clustering of Local Group distances: publication bias or correlated measurements? VII. A distance framework out to 100 Mpc

Abstract

We consider the published distance moduli to the Fornax and Coma galaxy clusters, with emphasis on the period since 1990. We have carefully homogenized our catalogs of distance moduli onto the distance scale established in the previous papers in this series. We assessed systematic differences associated with the use of specific tracers, and discarded results based on application of the Tully--Fisher relation and of globular cluster and planetary nebula luminosity functions. We recommend `best' weighted relative distance moduli for the Fornax and Coma clusters with respect to the Virgo cluster of $\Delta (m-M{)}_0^{\mathrm{Fornax}-\mathrm{Virgo}}=0.18\pm 0.28$ mag and $\Delta (m-M{)}_0^{\mathrm{Coma}-\mathrm{Virgo}}=3.75\pm 0.23$ mag. The set of weighted mean distance moduli (distances) we derived as most representative of the clusters' distances is, \begin{eqnarray} (m-M)_0^{\rm Fornax} &=& 31.41 \pm 0.15 \mbox{ mag } (D = 19.1^{+1.4}_{-1.2} \mbox{ Mpc) and} \nonumber &=& 31.21 \pm 0.28 \mbox{ mag } (D = 17.5^{+2.4}_{-2.2} \mbox{ Mpc)}; \nonumber \\ (m-M)_0^{\rm Coma} &=& 34.99 \pm 0.38 \mbox{ mag } (D = 99.5^{+19.0}_{-15.9} \mbox{ Mpc) and} \nonumber &=& 34.78 \pm 0.27 \mbox{ mag } (D = 90.4^{+11.9}_{-10.6} \mbox{ Mpc)}, \nonumber \end{eqnarray} where the first value for each cluster is the result of our analysis of the direct distance moduli, while the second modulus is based on distance moduli relative to the Virgo cluster. The absolute and relative distance moduli for both clusters are mutually consistent within the uncertainties; the relative distance moduli yield shorter distances by $\sim$1$\sigma$. Lingering uncertainties in the underlying absolute distance scale appear to have given rise to a systematic uncertainty on the order of 0.20 mag.

15 pages, 3 figures; accepted for publication in ApJS

References in corpus (17)

• Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics Beyond LambdaCDM
• Forty-Seven Milky Way-Sized, Extremely Diffuse Galaxies in the Coma Cluster
• Clustering of Local Group distances: publication bias or correlated measurements? I. The Large Magellanic Cloud
• SFI++ I: A New I-band Tully-Fisher Template, the Cluster Peculiar Velocity Dispersion and H0
• From Spitzer Galaxy Photometry to Tully-Fisher Distances
• Clustering of Local Group distances: publication bias or correlated measurements? III. The Small Magellanic Cloud
• A Problem with the Clustering of Recent Measures of the Distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud
• The HST/ACS Coma Cluster Survey: I - Survey Objectives and Design
• The Globular Cluster Systems in the Coma Ellipticals. IV: WFPC2 Photometry for Five Giant Ellipticals
• Clustering of Local Group distances: publication bias or correlated measurements? II. M31 and beyond
• Clustering of Local Group distances: publication bias or correlated measurements? IV. The Galactic Center
• Surface Brightness Fluctuations from archival ACS images: a stellar population and distance study
• The Calibration of the WISE W1 and W2 Tully-Fisher Relation
• Calibrating Type Ia Supernovae using the Planetary Nebula Luminosity Function I. Initial Results
• First results from SAPAC: towards a 3D-picture of the Fornax cluster core
• Clustering of Local Group distances: publication bias or correlated measurements? V. Galactic rotation constants
• Clustering of Local Group distances: publication bias or correlated measurements? VI. Extending to Virgo cluster distances

Cited by in corpus (3)

• The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics
• MFV approach to robust estimate of neutron lifetime
• Globular Clusters in NGC 4839 Falling into Coma: Evidence for the Second Infall?