Bryan's Maximum Entropy Method -- diagnosis of a flawed argument and its remedy
arXiv:2002.09865 · doi:10.3390/data5030085
Abstract
The Maximum Entropy Method (MEM) is a popular data analysis technique based on Bayesian inference, which has found various applications in the research literature. While the MEM itself is well-grounded in statistics, I argue that its state-of-the-art implementation, suggested originally by Bryan, artificially restricts its solution space. This restriction leads to a systematic error often unaccounted for in contemporary MEM studies. The goal of this paper is to carefully revisit Bryan's train of thought, point out its flaw in applying linear algebra arguments to an inherently nonlinear problem, and suggest possible ways to overcome it.
16 pages, 3 figures, peer reviewed and published version
References in corpus (4)
Cited by in corpus (11)
- Nevanlinna Analytical Continuation
- Analytical Continuation of Matrix-Valued Functions: Carathéodory Formalism
- Robust analytic continuation of Green's functions via projection, pole estimation, and semidefinite relaxation
- Reconstructing spectral functions via automatic differentiation
- New developments in lattice QCD on equilibrium physics and phase diagram
- Minimal Pole Representation and Controlled Analytic Continuation of Matsubara Response Functions
- Minimal pole representation and analytic continuation of matrix-valued correlation functions
- Machine learning spectral functions in lattice QCD
- Estimates of the dynamic structure factor for the finite temperature electron liquid via analytic continuation of path integral Monte Carlo data
- Dual formulation of the maximum entropy method applied to analytic continuation of quantum Monte Carlo data
- The noiseless limit and improved-prior limit of the maximum entropy method and their implications for the analytic continuation problem