Absorbing Boundary Condition as Limiting Case of Imaginary Potentials
arXiv:1911.12730 · doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ac9bea
Abstract
Imaginary potentials such as (with a constant, a subset of 3-space, and its characteristic function) have been used in quantum mechanics as models of a detector. They represent the effect of a "soft" detector that takes a while to notice a particle in the detector volume . In order to model a "hard" detector (i.e., one that registers a particle as soon as it enters ), one may think of taking the limit of increasing detector strength . However, as pointed out by Allcock, in this limit the particle never enters ; its wave function gets reflected at the boundary of in the same way as by a Dirichlet boundary condition on . This phenomenon, a cousin of the "quantum Zeno effect," might suggest that a hard detector is mathematically impossible. Nevertheless, a mathematical description of a hard detector has recently been put forward in the form of the "absorbing boundary rule" involving an absorbing boundary condition on the detecting surface . We show here that in a suitable (non-obvious) limit, the imaginary potential yields a non-trivial distribution of detection time and place in agreement with the absorbing boundary rule. That is, a hard detector can be obtained as a limit, but it is a different limit than Allcock considered.
12 pages LaTeX, no figures
References in corpus (4)
- Detection of a quantum particle on a lattice under repeated projective measurements
- Quantum Dynamics under continuous projective measurements: non-Hermitian description and the continuous space limit
- Existence of Schrodinger Evolution with Absorbing Boundary Condition
- Hilbert space partitioning for non-Hermitian Hamiltonians: From off-resonance to Zeno subspaces
Cited by in corpus (8)
- Quantum Dynamics under continuous projective measurements: non-Hermitian description and the continuous space limit
- Existence of Schrodinger Evolution with Absorbing Boundary Condition
- On a Derivation of the Absorbing Boundary Rule
- Inequivalence of stochastic and Bohmian arrival times in time-of-flight experiments
- Absorbing detectors meet scattering theory
- Detection Time Distribution Predicted Using Absorbing Boundary Conditions and Imaginary Potentials
- A solution of the quantum time of arrival problem via mathematical probability theory
- Energy-Time Uncertainty Relation for Absorbing Boundaries