The reliability of a deep learning model in clinical out-of-distribution MRI data: a multicohort study

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) methods have in recent years yielded impressive results in medical imaging, with the potential to function as clinical aid to radiologists. However, DL models in medical imaging are often trained on public research cohorts with images acquired with a single scanner or with strict protocol harmonization, which is not representative of a clinical setting. The aim of this study was to investigate how well a DL model performs in unseen clinical data sets---collected with different scanners, protocols and disease populations---and whether more heterogeneous training data improves generalization. In total, 3117 MRI scans of brains from multiple dementia research cohorts and memory clinics, that had been visually rated by a neuroradiologist according to Scheltens' scale of medial temporal atrophy (MTA), were included in this study. By training multiple versions of a convolutional neural network on different subsets of this data to predict MTA ratings, we assessed the impact of including images from a wider distribution during training had on performance in external memory clinic data. Our results showed that our model generalized well to data sets acquired with similar protocols as the training data, but substantially worse in clinical cohorts with visibly different tissue contrasts in the images. This implies that future DL studies investigating performance in out-of-distribution (OOD) MRI data need to assess multiple external cohorts for reliable results. Further, by including data from a wider range of scanners and protocols the performance improved in OOD data, which suggests that more heterogeneous training data makes the model generalize better. To conclude, this is the most comprehensive study to date investigating the domain shift in deep learning on MRI data, and we advocate rigorous evaluation of DL models on clinical data prior to being certified for deployment.

11 pages, 3 figures

References in corpus (1)

• Can we trust deep learning models diagnosis? The impact of domain shift in chest radiograph classification

Cited by in corpus (15)

• Federated Learning Enables Big Data for Rare Cancer Boundary Detection
• Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning for Engineering Design and Health Prognostics: A Tutorial
• OpenFL: An open-source framework for Federated Learning
• DeepLesionBrain: Towards a broader deep-learning generalization for multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation
• Domain generalization in deep learning-based mass detection in mammography: A large-scale multi-center study
• Normalization of breast MRIs using Cycle-Consistent Generative Adversarial Networks
• A Dempster-Shafer approach to trustworthy AI with application to fetal brain MRI segmentation
• GaNDLF: A Generally Nuanced Deep Learning Framework for Scalable End-to-End Clinical Workflows in Medical Imaging
• Federated brain tumor segmentation: an extensive benchmark
• Ordinal Classification with Distance Regularization for Robust Brain Age Prediction
• Fréchet Radiomic Distance (FRD): A Versatile Metric for Comparing Medical Imaging Datasets
• CheXseen: Unseen Disease Detection for Deep Learning Interpretation of Chest X-rays
• Interpretability Aware Model Training to Improve Robustness against Out-of-Distribution Magnetic Resonance Images in Alzheimer's Disease Classification
• Glorbit: A Modular, Web-Based Platform for AI Based Periorbital Measurement in Low-Resource Settings
• An Empirical Framework for Domain Generalization in Clinical Settings