Fixation in Competing Populations: Diffusion and Strategies for Survival

Abstract

How should dispersal strategies be chosen to increase the likelihood of survival of a species? We obtain the answer for the spatially extended versions of three well-known models of two competing species with unequal diffusivities. Though identical at the mean-field level, the three models exhibit drastically different behaviour leading to different optimal strategies for survival, with or without a selective advantage for one species. With conserved total particle number, dispersal has no effect on survival probability. With a fluctuating number, faster dispersal is advantageous if intra-species competition is present, while moving slower is the optimal strategy for the disadvantaged species if there is no intra-species competition: it is imperative to include fluctuations to properly formulate survival strategies.

arXiv comment8 pages, 6 figures

References in corpus (11)

• Mobility promotes and jeopardizes biodiversity in rock-paper-scissors games
• Invasion threshold in heterogeneous metapopulation networks
• Genetic Demixing and Evolutionary Forces in the One-Dimensional Stepping Stone Model
• Fixation and consensus times on a network: a unified approach
• Growth, competition and cooperation in spatial population genetics
• Evolution arrests invasions of cooperative populations
• Selective advantage of diffusing faster
• Survival of the Scarcer
• Evolutionary Dynamics with Fluctuating Population Sizes and Strong Mutualism
• Spreading of non-motile bacteria on a hard agar plate: Comparison between agent-based and stochastic simulations
• Fixation in Fluctuating Populations