Sampling effects and measurement overlap can bias the inference of neuronal avalanches
arXiv:1910.09984 · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010678
Abstract
To date, it is still impossible to sample the entire mammalian brain with single-neuron precision. This forces one to either use spikes (focusing on few neurons) or to use coarse-sampled activity (averaging over many neurons, e.g. LFP). Naturally, the sampling technique impacts inference about collective properties. Here, we emulate both sampling techniques on a simple spiking model to quantify how they alter observed correlations and signatures of criticality. We describe a general effect: when the inter-electrode distance is small, electrodes sample overlapping regions in space, which increases the correlation between the signals. For coarse-sampled activity, this can produce power-law distributions even for non-critical systems. In contrast, spike recordings do not suffer this particular bias and underlying dynamics can be identified. This may resolve why coarse measures and spikes have produced contradicting results in the past.
14 pages, 7 figures, Supp. Info. w/ 7 pages
References in corpus (12)
- Colloquium: Criticality and dynamical scaling in living systems
- Criticality in the brain: A synthesis of neurobiology, models and cognition
- Does the 1/f frequency-scaling of brain signals reflect self-organized critical states?
- Spike Avalanches Exhibit Universal Dynamics across the Sleep-Wake Cycle
- Between perfectly critical and fully irregular: a reverberating model captures and predicts cortical spike propagation
- Self-organization toward criticality by synaptic plasticity
- The effect of thresholding on temporal avalanche statistics
- Time-series thresholding and the definition of avalanche size
- Subsampled directed-percolation models explain scaling relations experimentally observed in the brain
- The perils of thresholding
- Description of spreading dynamics by microscopic network models and macroscopic branching processes can differ due to coalescence
- Tailored ensembles of neural networks optimize sensitivity to stimulus statistics