A Transit of Venus Possibly Misinterpreted as an Unaided-Eye Sunspot Observation in China on 9 December 1874

Abstract

Large sunspots can be observed with the unaided eye under suitable atmospheric seeing conditions. Such observations are of particular value because the frequency of their appearance provides an approximate indication of the prevailing level of solar activity. Unaided-eye sunspot (UES) observations can be traced back well before the start of telescopic observations of the Sun, especially in the East Asian historical records. It is therefore important to compare more modern, UES observations with the results of telescopic sunspot observations, to gain a better understanding of the nature of the UES records. A previous comparison of Chinese UES records and Greenwich photo-heliographic results between 1874 and 1918 indicated that a few of the UES were apparently not supported by direct photographic evidence of at least one sunspot with a large area. This article reveals that one of the Chinese unaided-eye observations had possibly captured the transit of Venus on 9 December 1874. The Chinese sunspot records on this date are compared with Western sunspot observations on the same day. It is concluded that sunspots on the solar disk were quite small and the transit of Venus was probably misinterpreted as a sunspot by the Chinese local scholars. This case indicates that sunspots or comparable "obscuring" objects with an area as large as 1000 millionths of the solar disk could easily have been seen with the unaided eye under suitable seeing conditions. It also confirms the visibility of sunspots near the solar limb with the unaided eye. This study provides an explanation of the apparent discrepancy between the Chinese UES observation on 9 December 1874 and the Western sunspot observations using telescopes, as well as a basis for further discussion on the negative pairs in 1900 and 1911, apparently without sufficiently large area.

arXiv commentmain text 14 pages, appendices 4 pages, and references 5 pages, and 4 figures: accepted for publication in Solar Physics

References in corpus (25)

• Revisiting the Sunspot Number
• The new Sunspot Number: assembling all corrections
• Reconstruction of the Sunspot Group Number: the Backbone Method
• The Maunder minimum (1645--1715) was indeed a Grand minimum: A reassessment of multiple datasets
• Historical Sunspot Observations: A Review
• A Revised Collection of Sunspot Group Numbers
• The butterfly diagram in the 18th century
• Properties of sunspots in cycle 23: I. Dependence of brightness on sunspot size and cycle phase
• Starspot activity and superflares on solar-type stars
• Long-Lasting Extreme Magnetic Storm Activities in 1770 Found in Historical Documents
• Sunspot positions, areas, and group tilt angles for 1611-1631 from observations by Christoph Scheiner
• Tests of sunspot number sequences: 3. Effects of regression procedures on the calibration of historic sunspot data
• The sunspot observations by Samuel Heinrich Schwabe
• Records of sunspot and aurora during CE 960-1279 in the Chinese chronicle of the Song dynasty
• Sunspots during the Maunder Minimum from Machina Coelestis by Hevelius
• Records of Sunspots and Aurora Candidates in the Chinese Official Histories of the Yuán and Míng Dynasties during 1261-1644
• Sunspot Numbers and Areas from the Madrid Astronomical Observatory (1876-1986)
• Sunspot Observations during the Maunder Minimum from the Correspondence of John Flamsteed
• Tests of Sunspot Number Sequences: 1. Using Ionosonde Data
• Iwahashi Zenbei's Sunspot Drawings in 1793 in Japan
• Records of sunspot and aurora activity during 581-959 CE in Chinese official histories in the periods of Suí, Táng, and the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms
• Forty two years counting spots: solar observations by D. E. Hadden during 1890-1931 revisited
• Records of Auroral Candidates and Sunspots in Rikkokushi, Chronicles of Ancient Japan from Early 7th Century to 887
• Revisiting Kunitomo's Sunspot Drawings during 1835-1836 in Japan
• Sunspot Drawings by Japanese Official Astronomers in 1749-1750