The True Sample Complexity of Identifying Good Arms
arXiv:1906.06594
Abstract
We consider two multi-armed bandit problems with arms: (i) given an , identify an arm with mean that is within of the largest mean and (ii) given a threshold and integer , identify arms with means larger than . Existing lower bounds and algorithms for the PAC framework suggest that both of these problems require samples. However, we argue that these definitions not only conflict with how these algorithms are used in practice, but also that these results disagree with intuition that says (i) requires only samples where and (ii) requires samples where . We provide definitions that formalize these intuitions, obtain lower bounds that match the above sample complexities, and develop explicit, practical algorithms that achieve nearly matching upper bounds.
References in corpus (9)
- On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Models
- lil' UCB : An Optimal Exploration Algorithm for Multi-Armed Bandits
- Simple regret for infinitely many armed bandits
- Nearly Instance Optimal Sample Complexity Bounds for Top-k Arm Selection
- The Simulator: Understanding Adaptive Sampling in the Moderate-Confidence Regime
- Thresholding Bandits with Augmented UCB
- Pure Exploration with Multiple Correct Answers
- A Bandit Approach to Multiple Testing with False Discovery Control
- PAC Identification of Many Good Arms in Stochastic Multi-Armed Bandits
Cited by in corpus (7)
- An Optimal Elimination Algorithm for Learning a Best Arm
- My Fair Bandit: Distributed Learning of Max-Min Fairness with Multi-player Bandits
- On Regret with Multiple Best Arms
- Bandits with many optimal arms
- Lenient Regret and Good-Action Identification in Gaussian Process Bandits
- Pure Exploration in Kernel and Neural Bandits
- Near Instance Optimal Model Selection for Pure Exploration Linear Bandits