Characterizing the Infall Times and Quenching Timescales of Milky Way Satellites with $Gaia$ Proper Motions

Abstract

Observations of low-mass satellite galaxies in the nearby Universe point towards a strong dichotomy in their star-forming properties relative to systems with similar mass in the field. Specifically, satellite galaxies are preferentially gas poor and no longer forming stars, while their field counterparts are largely gas rich and actively forming stars. Much of the recent work to understand this dichotomy has been statistical in nature, determining not just that environmental processes are most likely responsible for quenching these low-mass systems but also that they must operate very quickly after infall onto the host system, with quenching timescales $\lesssim 2\mathrm{Gyr}$ at $M_{\star }\lesssim 10^8{\mathrm{M}}_{\odot }$. This work utilizes the newly-available $Gaia$ DR2 proper motion measurements along with the Phat ELVIS suite of high-resolution, cosmological, zoom-in simulations to study low-mass satellite quenching around the Milky Way on an object-by-object basis. We derive constraints on the infall times for $37$ of the known low-mass satellite galaxies of the Milky Way, finding that $\gtrsim 70\%$ of the `classical' satellites of the Milky Way are consistent with the very short quenching timescales inferred from the total population in previous works. The remaining classical Milky Way satellites have quenching timescales noticeably longer, with ${\tau }_{\mathrm{quench}}\sim 6-8\mathrm{Gyr}$, highlighting how detailed orbital modeling is likely necessary to understand the specifics of environmental quenching for individual satellite galaxies. Additionally, we find that the $6$ ultra-faint dwarf galaxies with publicly available $HST$-based star-formation histories are all consistent with having their star formation shut down prior to infall onto the Milky Way -- which, combined with their very early quenching times, strongly favors quenching driven by reionization.

13 pages, 7 figures, submitted to MNRAS

Cited by in corpus (22)

• The Milky Way total mass profile as inferred from Gaia DR2
• Gaia early DR3 systemic motions of Local Group dwarf galaxies and orbital properties with a massive Large Magellanic Cloud
• APOGEE Chemical Abundance Patterns of the Massive Milky Way Satellites
• The Gas Content and Stripping of Local Group Dwarf Galaxies
• Birds of a Feather? Magellan/IMACS Spectroscopy of the Ultra-Faint Satellites Grus II, Tucana IV, and Tucana V
• Multiple Chemodynamic Stellar Populations of the Ursa Minor Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy
• A homogeneous measurement of the delay between the onsets of gas stripping and star formation quenching in satellite galaxies of groups and clusters
• The stellar metallicity gradients of Local Group dwarf galaxies
• Pericentric passage-driven star formation in satellite galaxies and their hosts: CLUES from Local Group simulations
• Uncertainties associated with the backward integration of dwarf satellites using simple parametric potentials
• The Milky Way's stellar streams and globular clusters do not align in a Vast Polar Structure
• The infall of dwarf satellite galaxies are influenced by their host's massive accretions
• The effects of LMC-mass environments on their dwarf satellite galaxies in the FIRE simulations
• Long-term orbital evolution of Galactic satellites and the effects on their star formation histories
• Spectroscopic Confirmation of the Sixth Globular Cluster in the Fornax Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy
• Stellar proper motions in the outskirts of classical dwarf spheroidal galaxies with Gaia EDR3
• Metallicity Distribution Function of the Eridanus~II Ultra-Faint Dwarf Galaxy from Hubble Space Telescope Narrow-band Imaging
• The Isaac Newton Telescope monitoring survey of Local Group dwarf galaxies. II. The star formation history of Andromeda I derived from long period variables
• No globular cluster progenitors in Milky Way satellite galaxies
• Can tides explain the low dark matter density in Fornax?
• Warm dark matter model with a few keV mass is bad for the too-big-to-fail problem
• The Milky Way satellite velocity function is a sharp probe of small-scale structure problems