Distinguishing Polar and Co-planar Circumbinary Exoplanets by Eclipsing Timing Variations
arXiv:1905.10179 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab24d5
Abstract
Circumbinary Planets (CBPs) can be misaligned with their host binary stars. Orbital dynamics, simulations, and recent observations of proto-planetary disks all suggest that the planet can stably orbit in a plane perpendicular to that of an eccentric host binary star (i.e., a polar orbit). No solid claim of detection of such a configuration has been made; the nine systems detected by the transit technique are nearly coplanar, but their discovery is also biased towards that configuration. Here, we develop Eclipse Timing Variations (ETVs) as a method to detect misaligned CBPs. We find that since apsidal motion (periastron precession) of the host binary is prograde for a coplanar planet and retrograde for a polar planet, the mean eclipse period of primary and secondary eclipses differ in a way that distinguishes those configurations. Secondly, the Eclipse Duration Variations (EDVs) vary in a way that can confirm that inference, over and against a polar model. Thirdly, the relative phasing of primary and secondary ETVs on the planet's orbital timescale also distinguishes the two configurations, which we explain analytically and quantify through a grid of numerical models. We apply these methods to Kepler-34, a transiting planet known to be nearly coplanar by detailed photodynamic modeling. In this system, we find that the binary eclipse times alone suffice to distinguish these orbital configurations, using the effects introduced here. Our work provides a tool for discovering potential polar CBPs, or misaligned CBPs of milder inclinations, from the existing ETV dataset of the Kepler, as well as future observations by TESS or PLATO.
24 pages, 16 figures. Submitted to ApJ and ready for second round review. Comments are welcomed!
References in corpus (15)
- DHP Framework: Digital Health Passports Using Blockchain -- Use case on international tourism during the COVID-19 pandemic
- EXOFAST: A fast exoplanetary fitting suite in IDL
- The Transiting Circumbinary Planets Kepler-34 and Kepler-35
- Eclipse Timing Variation Analyses of Eccentric Binaries with Close Tertiaries in the Kepler field
- Misaligned Disks in the Binary Protostar IRS 43
- Planets Transiting Non-Eclipsing Binaries
- Misaligned Protoplanetary Disks in a Young Binary System
- Polar alignment of a protoplanetary disk around an eccentric binary
- A circumbinary protoplanetary disc in a polar configuration
- Inclination Evolution of Protoplanetary Disks Around Eccentric Binaries
- Uncovering Circumbinary Planetary Architectural Properties from Selection Biases
- Linear Analysis of the Evolution of Nearly Polar Low Mass Circumbinary Discs
- Spiral Arms, Infall, and Misalignment of the Circumbinary Disk from the Circumstellar Disks in the Protostellar Binary System L1551 NE
- Circumbinary planets - why they are so likely to transit
- Transit probability of precessing circumstellar planets in binaries and exomoons
Cited by in corpus (9)
- Polar planets around highly eccentric binaries are the most stable
- Formation of polar terrestrial circumbinary planets
- A radial limit on polar circumbinary orbits from general relativity
- Evidence for a polar circumbinary exoplanet orbiting a pair of eclipsing brown dwarfs
- Polar alignment of a massive retrograde circumbinary disc around an eccentric binary
- Orbital dynamics of two circumbinary planets around misaligned eccentric binaries
- Coplanar circumbinary planets can be unstable to large tilt oscillations in the presence of an inner polar planet
- Orbital stability of two circumbinary planets around misaligned eccentric binaries
- Birth environment of circumbinary planets: are there CBPs on the inclined orbits?