The prospects of a quantitative measurement of agility: A validation study on an agile maturity model
arXiv:1904.02444 · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2015.05.008
Abstract
Agile development has now become a well-known approach to collaboration in professional work life. Both researchers and practitioners want validated tools to measure agility. This study sets out to validate an agile maturity measurement model with statistical tests and empirical data. First, a pretest was conducted as a case study including a survey and focus group. Second, the main study was conducted with 45 employees from two SAP customers in the US. We used internal consistency (by a Cronbach's alpha) as the main measure for reliability and analyzed construct validity by exploratory principal factor analysis (PFA). The results suggest a new categorization of a subset of items existing in the tool and provides empirical support for these new groups of factors. However, we argue that more work is needed to reach the point where a maturity models with quantitative data can be said to validly measure agility, and even then, such a measurement still needs to include some deeper analysis with cultural and contextual items.
Cited by in corpus (6)
- Group development and group maturity when building agile teams: A qualitative and quantitative investigation at eight large companies
- Agile Ways of Working: A Team Maturity Perspective
- The links between agile practices, interpersonal conflict, and perceived productivity
- Design of Transformation Initiatives Implementing Organisational Agility -- An Empirical Study
- The Connections Between Group Maturity, Software Development Velocity and Planning Effectiveness
- Useful Statistical Methods for Human Factors Research in Software Engineering: A Discussion on Validation with Quantitative Data