25 years of criticality in neuroscience -- established results, open controversies, novel concepts

Abstract

Twenty-five years ago, Dunkelmann and Radons (1994) proposed that neural networks should self-organize to a critical state. In models, criticality offers a number of computational advantages. Thus this hypothesis, and in particular the experimental work by Beggs and Plenz (2003), has triggered an avalanche of research, with thousands of studies referring to it. Nonetheless, experimental results are still contradictory. How is it possible, that a hypothesis has attracted active research for decades, but nonetheless remains controversial? We discuss the experimental and conceptual controversy, and then present a parsimonious solution that (i) unifies the contradictory experimental results, (ii) avoids disadvantages of a critical state, and (iii) enables rapid, adaptive tuning of network properties to task requirements.

8 pages

References in corpus (6)

• Dynamical synapses causing self-organized criticality in neural networks
• Does the 1/f frequency-scaling of brain signals reflect self-organized critical states?
• Spike Avalanches Exhibit Universal Dynamics across the Sleep-Wake Cycle
• Landau-Ginzburg theory of cortex dynamics: Scale-free avalanches emerge at the edge of synchronization
• Quasi-Critical Brain Dynamics on a Non-Equilibrium Widom Line
• Coexistence of critical sensitivity and subcritical specificity can yield optimal population coding